<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: portmap translations failed from inside to inside in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/portmap-translations-failed-from-inside-to-inside/m-p/1496051#M717407</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Carl,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have static PAT configured on the Firewall?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When do you get those errors?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you mean with both IP addresses exist on the inside interface?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there's a communication between two IPs on the same segment, this traffic should not go through the Firewall (unless there's something not configured correctly).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please explain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Federico.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:56:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Federico Coto Fajardo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-01T13:56:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>portmap translations failed from inside to inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/portmap-translations-failed-from-inside-to-inside/m-p/1496050#M717406</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am gettings lots of errors on my firewall, saying portmap translation failed, but the thing is both ip addresses exist on the inside interface, so why is the firewall doing this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have turned nat control off just in case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Carl&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:53:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/portmap-translations-failed-from-inside-to-inside/m-p/1496050#M717406</guid>
      <dc:creator>carl_townshend</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T17:53:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: portmap translations failed from inside to inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/portmap-translations-failed-from-inside-to-inside/m-p/1496051#M717407</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Carl,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have static PAT configured on the Firewall?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When do you get those errors?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you mean with both IP addresses exist on the inside interface?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there's a communication between two IPs on the same segment, this traffic should not go through the Firewall (unless there's something not configured correctly).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please explain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Federico.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:56:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/portmap-translations-failed-from-inside-to-inside/m-p/1496051#M717407</guid>
      <dc:creator>Federico Coto Fajardo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-01T13:56:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: portmap translations failed from inside to inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/portmap-translations-failed-from-inside-to-inside/m-p/1496052#M717408</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is PAT configured on the firewall, the addresses I am seeing are addresses that are on the inside of the network so shouldnt even be touching the firewall, would this be a routing issue somewhere?? the firewall is running eigrp and the route to inside is load balanced to 2 locations, would this affect it ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Carl&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:06:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/portmap-translations-failed-from-inside-to-inside/m-p/1496052#M717408</guid>
      <dc:creator>carl_townshend</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-02T09:06:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: portmap translations failed from inside to inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/portmap-translations-failed-from-inside-to-inside/m-p/1496053#M717409</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Probably this is a routing issue since you are saying that these packets should be routed internally and not even hit the ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would check the previous hop and its routing for the ip addresses involved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:31:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/portmap-translations-failed-from-inside-to-inside/m-p/1496053#M717409</guid>
      <dc:creator>Panos Kampanakis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-03T00:31:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

