<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Renaming Pix 525 Interfaces in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377426#M721468</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your comments..&lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="laugh" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you find my comments are ok...please rate it..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;karuppu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:45:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KARUPPUCHAMY MALAIYANDI</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-25T15:45:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Renaming Pix 525 Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377422#M721461</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are in the process of upgrading our ISP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;connection from 100Mb to 300Mb.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently utilize ethernet0 with a nameif of "outside"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When we upgrade, we will be utilizing gb-ethernet0 with a nameif of "intf2".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As this upgrade will be a "hot cut", can I simply change the nameif of gb-ethernet0 to "outside" to maintain existing configuration references to "outside".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ethernet0&amp;nbsp; will be disconnected for the upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom Maguire&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:14:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377422#M721461</guid>
      <dc:creator>tffmaguire</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T17:14:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Renaming Pix 525 Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377423#M721464</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;//As this upgrade will be a "hot cut", can I simply change the nameif of gb-ethernet0 to "outside" to maintain existing configuration references to "outside".//&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is the best solution for migrating link from 100 Mbps to 300Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this scenario no need to change the ACL.NAT and etc.&amp;nbsp; so no worries...only the thing is need to change then new interface name as "OUTSIDE" and the security-level also sholud be same as the existing one..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;advance wishes for your migration..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;karuppu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377423#M721464</guid>
      <dc:creator>KARUPPUCHAMY MALAIYANDI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-25T15:31:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Renaming Pix 525 Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377424#M721465</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;First you have to issue no nameif on the ether0 which is presently the outside which will remove all lines referring to outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;like ssh lines and http lines and access-g lines.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once you configure the new gig interface as the outside interface you will have to put back the removed access-g, ssh and http lines. The access-list will not be removed just the access-group line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-KS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:43:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377424#M721465</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kureli Sankar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-25T15:43:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Renaming Pix 525 Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377425#M721466</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Karuppu.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That was the answer I was hoping for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:43:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377425#M721466</guid>
      <dc:creator>tffmaguire</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-25T15:43:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Renaming Pix 525 Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377426#M721468</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your comments..&lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="laugh" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you find my comments are ok...please rate it..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;karuppu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:45:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377426#M721468</guid>
      <dc:creator>KARUPPUCHAMY MALAIYANDI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-25T15:45:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Renaming Pix 525 Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377427#M721471</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the added detail.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:48:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/renaming-pix-525-interfaces/m-p/1377427#M721471</guid>
      <dc:creator>tffmaguire</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-26T11:48:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

