<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic firewall failover in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/1415808#M730109</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Friends,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;here is the setup :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;firewall1- Standby(failed)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;firewall2- Active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;these are firewall modules. out of some reason(which i need to find) , primary module suddenly stopped responding and failed over seemlessly to the secondary making it the active.( Switch fabrics remain in normal state with no hsrp failover).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to reload the now failed module. the only way i see is to reset module within switch fabric.this brings me to some doubts:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. would the now active(fw2) go back to secondary state if failed module(fw1) is reset ( i.e. would fw1 become active again)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. will this cause a disruption in traffic flow, if so what is the expected duration&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. all the interfaces on the failed one show as not monitored, apart from physical issues, is there anything else we need to look upon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate all your help on this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:11:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>suthomas1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T17:11:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>firewall failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/1415808#M730109</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Friends,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;here is the setup :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;firewall1- Standby(failed)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;firewall2- Active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;these are firewall modules. out of some reason(which i need to find) , primary module suddenly stopped responding and failed over seemlessly to the secondary making it the active.( Switch fabrics remain in normal state with no hsrp failover).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to reload the now failed module. the only way i see is to reset module within switch fabric.this brings me to some doubts:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. would the now active(fw2) go back to secondary state if failed module(fw1) is reset ( i.e. would fw1 become active again)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. will this cause a disruption in traffic flow, if so what is the expected duration&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. all the interfaces on the failed one show as not monitored, apart from physical issues, is there anything else we need to look upon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate all your help on this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:11:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/1415808#M730109</guid>
      <dc:creator>suthomas1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T17:11:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: firewall failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/1415809#M730110</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; When you bring up the failed module, it will stay as the seconday&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only time a failed module will preempt it when you are using acti/active with preempt enable. In your case you are using active/standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Franco&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/1415809#M730110</guid>
      <dc:creator>francisco_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-18T14:48:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: firewall failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/1415810#M730111</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks, if i do a no failover active, will the current fw1 become active.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:33:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/1415810#M730111</guid>
      <dc:creator>suthomas1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-18T15:33:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: firewall failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/1415811#M730112</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The "no failover active" command you can run on the active unit to Force a failover to the standby unit in your case which is now the fw1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:40:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/1415811#M730112</guid>
      <dc:creator>francisco_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-18T15:40:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

