<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAT design help for 515E in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-design-help-for-515e/m-p/1409652#M736775</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A static NAT using PAT was my original approach.&amp;nbsp; I could set this up easily for incoming mail.&amp;nbsp; The problem is dealing with the outgoing interface on the mail gateway.&amp;nbsp; This interface has a different private IP, but is also using port 25.&amp;nbsp; I am not sure how the PIX would translate outgoing mail (from this second interface) on the same public IP (as incoming).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:48:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RegionDist19</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-17T18:48:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAT design help for 515E</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-design-help-for-515e/m-p/1409650#M736767</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a PIX515E on software 8.0(4).&amp;nbsp; We are in the process of upgrading our mail gateway and I need to modify our NAT statement to facilitate traffic.&amp;nbsp; Here is the scenario:&amp;nbsp; The mail gateway has an inbound and outbound interface on the same private subnet.&amp;nbsp; Incoming mail-flow will translate from &amp;lt;public address A&amp;gt;:25 to &amp;lt;incoming gateway interface 1&amp;gt;:25.&amp;nbsp; Outgoing mail-flow will translate from &amp;lt;outgoing gateway interface 2&amp;gt;:25 to &amp;lt;public address A&amp;gt;:25.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Is it possible to create a Dynamic Policy NAT rule to establish communication?&amp;nbsp; Thanks. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:11:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-design-help-for-515e/m-p/1409650#M736767</guid>
      <dc:creator>RegionDist19</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T17:11:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT design help for 515E</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-design-help-for-515e/m-p/1409651#M736772</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since this is a server, I will recommend a STATIC NAT instead than dynamic NAT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will this work for you?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Federico.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:39:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-design-help-for-515e/m-p/1409651#M736772</guid>
      <dc:creator>Federico Coto Fajardo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-17T18:39:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT design help for 515E</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-design-help-for-515e/m-p/1409652#M736775</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A static NAT using PAT was my original approach.&amp;nbsp; I could set this up easily for incoming mail.&amp;nbsp; The problem is dealing with the outgoing interface on the mail gateway.&amp;nbsp; This interface has a different private IP, but is also using port 25.&amp;nbsp; I am not sure how the PIX would translate outgoing mail (from this second interface) on the same public IP (as incoming).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:48:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-design-help-for-515e/m-p/1409652#M736775</guid>
      <dc:creator>RegionDist19</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-17T18:48:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT design help for 515E</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-design-help-for-515e/m-p/1409653#M736778</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;RegionDist19 wrote:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A static NAT using PAT was my original approach.&amp;nbsp; I could set this up easily for incoming mail.&amp;nbsp; The problem is dealing with the outgoing interface on the mail gateway.&amp;nbsp; This interface has a different private IP, but is also using port 25.&amp;nbsp; I am not sure how the PIX would translate outgoing mail (from this second interface) on the same public IP (as incoming).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can't map the same public IP on the same port to 2 different private IPs on the same port because the pix will have no way of knowing which IP to send the traffic to on an incoming connection from the Internet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It just can't be done that way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-design-help-for-515e/m-p/1409653#M736778</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-17T18:53:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

