<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is AES-256-CBC the same as AES-256-SHA? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-aes-256-cbc-the-same-as-aes-256-sha/m-p/3787526#M7505</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Trying to VPN peer an ASA 5505 to a 3rd party's Palo Alto.&amp;nbsp; The only IKE/IPSec options they have are CBC and GCM.&amp;nbsp; Are either of those the same as the AES256-SHA that the ASA's support or am I out of luck?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dean Romanelli</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T16:42:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is AES-256-CBC the same as AES-256-SHA?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-aes-256-cbc-the-same-as-aes-256-sha/m-p/3787526#M7505</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Trying to VPN peer an ASA 5505 to a 3rd party's Palo Alto.&amp;nbsp; The only IKE/IPSec options they have are CBC and GCM.&amp;nbsp; Are either of those the same as the AES256-SHA that the ASA's support or am I out of luck?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-aes-256-cbc-the-same-as-aes-256-sha/m-p/3787526#M7505</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dean Romanelli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T16:42:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is AES-256-CBC the same as AES-256-SHA?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-aes-256-cbc-the-same-as-aes-256-sha/m-p/3787534#M7506</link>
      <description>Hi Dean,&lt;BR /&gt;AES-CBC is an encryption algorithm, whereas SHA is a hashing algorithm, they are seperate algorithms. AES-GCM algorithm performs both encryption and hashing functions without requiring a seperate hashing algorithm, it is the latest Suite B Next Generation algorithm and probably not supported on as ASA 5505. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So on the ASA you'd define the encryption as AES-CBC 128|192|256 and then hashing as SHA 128|192|256, that should work fine with the PA firewall.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Example:-&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;crypto ikev1 policy 10&lt;BR /&gt; encryption aes-256&lt;BR /&gt; hash sha&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set VPN-TRANSFORM esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:39:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-aes-256-cbc-the-same-as-aes-256-sha/m-p/3787534#M7506</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-24T19:39:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is AES-256-CBC the same as AES-256-SHA?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-aes-256-cbc-the-same-as-aes-256-sha/m-p/3787543#M7507</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for replying. So basically I would just configure the ASA the same way I always have and not worry about the CBC verbiage right? The thing that's throwing me off is on the Palo it is called "AES-256-CBC," whereas on the ASA it is not called "CBC" anywhere.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-aes-256-cbc-the-same-as-aes-256-sha/m-p/3787543#M7507</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dean Romanelli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-24T19:58:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is AES-256-CBC the same as AES-256-SHA?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-aes-256-cbc-the-same-as-aes-256-sha/m-p/3787546#M7568</link>
      <description>Hi, on the ASA it doesn't explictly state it's AES-CBC but it is.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-aes-256-cbc-the-same-as-aes-256-sha/m-p/3787546#M7568</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-24T20:05:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is AES-256-CBC the same as AES-256-SHA?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-aes-256-cbc-the-same-as-aes-256-sha/m-p/5134396#M1113688</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there Cisco doc reference that specifies that?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 02:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-aes-256-cbc-the-same-as-aes-256-sha/m-p/5134396#M1113688</guid>
      <dc:creator>mforbes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-21T02:52:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

