<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Fun with  NAT on ASA in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fun-with-nat-on-asa/m-p/1422537#M750622</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I failed to mention, I have &lt;STRONG&gt;"same-security-traffic permit intra-interface"&lt;/STRONG&gt; enabled as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:25:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>spollock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-23T18:25:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fun with  NAT on ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fun-with-nat-on-asa/m-p/1422536#M750605</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If&amp;nbsp; a host on 192.168.1.x, the inside interface tries to ping a host on 192.168.10.x (a network behind a router which is connected 6.1)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ASA returns:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan 23 2010 10:17:58: %ASA-3-305006: &lt;STRONG&gt;portmap translation creation&lt;/STRONG&gt; failed for icmp src inside:192.168.1.3 dst inside:192.168.10.22 (type 8, code 0)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and the ping fails.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you try to ping directly from the ASA you get a similar result:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;#ping 192.168.10.22&lt;BR /&gt;Type escape sequence to abort.&lt;BR /&gt;Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.10.22, timeout is 2 seconds:&lt;BR /&gt;Jan 23 2010 10:20:35: %ASA-4-313004: Denied ICMP type=0, from laddr 192.168.1.6 on interface inside to 192.168.1.1:&lt;STRONG&gt; no matching session&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems to me this should work right out of the box, suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;lt;config snip&amp;gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;name 192.168.10.0 &lt;STRONG&gt;Cowacella&lt;/STRONG&gt; description &lt;EM&gt;named after thomas J's Monticello with a cow twist&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list inside_access_in_1 extended permit ip any any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat-control&lt;BR /&gt;global (outside) 1 interface&lt;BR /&gt;nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group inside_access_in_1 in interface inside&lt;BR /&gt;route inside &lt;STRONG&gt;Cowacella&lt;/STRONG&gt; 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.6 1&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:00:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fun-with-nat-on-asa/m-p/1422536#M750605</guid>
      <dc:creator>spollock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T17:00:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fun with  NAT on ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fun-with-nat-on-asa/m-p/1422537#M750622</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I failed to mention, I have &lt;STRONG&gt;"same-security-traffic permit intra-interface"&lt;/STRONG&gt; enabled as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:25:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fun-with-nat-on-asa/m-p/1422537#M750622</guid>
      <dc:creator>spollock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-23T18:25:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fun with  NAT on ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fun-with-nat-on-asa/m-p/1422538#M750632</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are running into assymetric routing scenario over here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Either you can set the default gateway of hosts on all subnets to be the 6.1 (router) &amp;amp; have its default gateway set to the ASA inside ifc OR if you real,ly wanna keep the ASA as everybody's default gateway, then you can use the tcp-state-bypass feature introduced in 8.2 release of code for ASA, so that assymetric situation here can be handled correctly by ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check it out at the release notes :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa82/command/reference/s1.html#wp1428242"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa82/command/reference/s1.html#wp1428242&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vijaya&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:06:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fun-with-nat-on-asa/m-p/1422538#M750632</guid>
      <dc:creator>vilaxmi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-24T05:06:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fun with  NAT on ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fun-with-nat-on-asa/m-p/1422539#M750671</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is really simple my firend,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;all you need to do is to put a static command&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,inside) 192.168.1.x 192.168.1.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;have a look on the attached file to understand the scenario in a better way..........:)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sachin Vaish&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:22:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fun-with-nat-on-asa/m-p/1422539#M750671</guid>
      <dc:creator>svaish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-24T15:22:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fun with  NAT on ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fun-with-nat-on-asa/m-p/1422540#M750698</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Making the firewall inside ifc proxy arp for inside hosts using global (inside) 1 ifc statement along with the Identity static translation for destination&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;command was a workaround we used&lt;STRONG&gt; PRE 8.2 era&lt;/STRONG&gt;.. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; Anyways, I would&amp;nbsp; suggest the usage of solution&amp;nbsp; (tcp-state-bypass feature) in the 8.2 + codes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vijaya&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:09:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fun-with-nat-on-asa/m-p/1422540#M750698</guid>
      <dc:creator>vilaxmi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-24T17:09:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

