<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Same Security levels on multiple interfaces in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-security-levels-on-multiple-interfaces/m-p/1348227#M751275</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Why should one keep same security levels on multiple interfaces on Cisco Firewalls? What could be the impact? I was under the impression that same security level cannot be given on multiple interfaces, but i came across a configuration,and had to change my assumption. Just want to understand the best practice and the impact if we configure the interfaces in such a way that 2 interfaces have sec-level 60, 2 have sec-level 80 with remaining as inside and outside...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mohsin.khan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T16:55:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Same Security levels on multiple interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-security-levels-on-multiple-interfaces/m-p/1348227#M751275</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why should one keep same security levels on multiple interfaces on Cisco Firewalls? What could be the impact? I was under the impression that same security level cannot be given on multiple interfaces, but i came across a configuration,and had to change my assumption. Just want to understand the best practice and the impact if we configure the interfaces in such a way that 2 interfaces have sec-level 60, 2 have sec-level 80 with remaining as inside and outside...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-security-levels-on-multiple-interfaces/m-p/1348227#M751275</guid>
      <dc:creator>mohsin.khan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T16:55:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Same Security levels on multiple interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-security-levels-on-multiple-interfaces/m-p/1348228#M751297</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you assign same security level for multiple interface , there will no traffic flow by default unless you configure same-security-traffic permit inter-interface command.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is used to completely isolate traffic from two interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dileep&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:58:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-security-levels-on-multiple-interfaces/m-p/1348228#M751297</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dileep Sivadas Padmini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-11T09:58:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

