<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 5505 dual isp routing problem in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5505-dual-isp-routing-problem/m-p/1292853#M757287</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Outgoing traffic always uses the primary link not the backup interface! if the primary fails then the backup is used!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:47:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>francisco_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-23T14:47:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>5505 dual isp routing problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5505-dual-isp-routing-problem/m-p/1292852#M757286</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am not sure if I have a bug or if it is supposed to be this way. I have dual isp support working properly but the customer now wants to be able to route certain ip blocks out the "backup" interface. i add the static route and it takes it in the routing table. however, users are not able to get out. should i be able to do this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:30:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5505-dual-isp-routing-problem/m-p/1292852#M757286</guid>
      <dc:creator>sticano</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T16:30:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 5505 dual isp routing problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5505-dual-isp-routing-problem/m-p/1292853#M757287</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Outgoing traffic always uses the primary link not the backup interface! if the primary fails then the backup is used!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:47:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5505-dual-isp-routing-problem/m-p/1292853#M757287</guid>
      <dc:creator>francisco_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-23T14:47:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 5505 dual isp routing problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5505-dual-isp-routing-problem/m-p/1292854#M757288</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't believe so. It's an active/passive link only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5505-dual-isp-routing-problem/m-p/1292854#M757288</guid>
      <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-23T14:53:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 5505 dual isp routing problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5505-dual-isp-routing-problem/m-p/1292855#M757289</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott see this &lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00806e880b.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00806e880b.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:57:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5505-dual-isp-routing-problem/m-p/1292855#M757289</guid>
      <dc:creator>francisco_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-23T14:57:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

