<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NAC with CA in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ca/m-p/1274296#M762902</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it necessary to use the CA with NAC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if we donot use it what is the impact on the users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can we deply without CA without any problems&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:44:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>talha_490</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T11:44:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAC with CA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ca/m-p/1274296#M762902</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it necessary to use the CA with NAC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if we donot use it what is the impact on the users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can we deply without CA without any problems&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:44:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ca/m-p/1274296#M762902</guid>
      <dc:creator>talha_490</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T11:44:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC with CA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ca/m-p/1274297#M762907</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Talha,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, it's possible to deploy NAC without CA. You can use the self-signed certs, or get a cert from a third party vendor (Verisign or Godaddy etc)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faisal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:28:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ca/m-p/1274297#M762907</guid>
      <dc:creator>Faisal Sehbai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-21T13:28:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC with CA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ca/m-p/1274298#M762913</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks but why does cisco says one must use trusted third party CA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:21:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ca/m-p/1274298#M762913</guid>
      <dc:creator>talha_490</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-21T14:21:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC with CA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ca/m-p/1274299#M762915</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is recommended, not necessary. With self-signed certs you will have other issues also - like clients getting warning messages and other such nuisances.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faisal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:24:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ca/m-p/1274299#M762915</guid>
      <dc:creator>Faisal Sehbai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-21T14:24:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

