<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAC and Active directory users in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-and-active-directory-users/m-p/907623#M765464</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's an option to bounce the port when a user gets logged in.  As long as the users aren't plugged into an IP phone, that might be an option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other option is to allow non-authenticated clients to get a DHCP address from the normal range, meaning that the VLAN change won't affect them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:06:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cleidh_mor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-26T17:06:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAC and Active directory users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-and-active-directory-users/m-p/907619#M765455</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have implemented NAC on my campus.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but there is a big problem,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my users have to refresh their Ip addresses when the NAC changes their VLans.but they have not enough permission for releasing their Ip address and renew it,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any idea?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:51:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-and-active-directory-users/m-p/907619#M765455</guid>
      <dc:creator>emadehsan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T09:51:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC and Active directory users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-and-active-directory-users/m-p/907620#M765456</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i don't know if there is a 'cisco' solution, but in windows just edit their group policy in AD and give them permissions to change their network settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:50:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-and-active-directory-users/m-p/907620#M765456</guid>
      <dc:creator>srue</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-09T14:50:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC and Active directory users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-and-active-directory-users/m-p/907621#M765460</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The CCA Stub will enable users without admin rights to renew their IP automatically.  I just ran into this issue in our OOB deployment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Dave&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:14:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-and-active-directory-users/m-p/907621#M765460</guid>
      <dc:creator>davemit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-20T14:14:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC and Active directory users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-and-active-directory-users/m-p/907622#M765462</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unless they have changed it the stub just lets the updates run without admin rights.  It is easiest to just give them right to release and renew.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, we weren't allowed to do that and had to resort to using devcon.exe from Microsoft.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:15:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-and-active-directory-users/m-p/907622#M765462</guid>
      <dc:creator>pplsi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-21T21:15:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC and Active directory users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-and-active-directory-users/m-p/907623#M765464</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's an option to bounce the port when a user gets logged in.  As long as the users aren't plugged into an IP phone, that might be an option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other option is to allow non-authenticated clients to get a DHCP address from the normal range, meaning that the VLAN change won't affect them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:06:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-and-active-directory-users/m-p/907623#M765464</guid>
      <dc:creator>cleidh_mor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-26T17:06:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

