<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SNMP Polling of FWSM Passive Mate in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353991#M766952</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There should be different ip address assigned to the standby fwsm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you do: "sh run interface", from the output, you should see 2 ip addresses per interface. The second ip address would be the one assigned to the standby fwsm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface vlan 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 standby 1.1.1.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the above case, 1.1.1.2 is the standby ip address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-19T04:34:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SNMP Polling of FWSM Passive Mate</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353988#M766940</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have two 6513's with a FWSM in each. They are currently in Active Passive Mode so they share the same config. Is there anyway to poll the passive mate via SNMP for Serial number etc?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:23:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353988#M766940</guid>
      <dc:creator>bradleyordner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T17:23:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SNMP Polling of FWSM Passive Mate</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353989#M766945</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The standby FWSM normally has ip address as well. You should be able to poll the standby FWSM if you can poll the active FWSM for the same information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:40:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353989#M766945</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-19T03:40:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SNMP Polling of FWSM Passive Mate</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353990#M766949</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply. The standby shares the same outside address that we use for polling on the active unit?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:54:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353990#M766949</guid>
      <dc:creator>bradleyordner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-19T03:54:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SNMP Polling of FWSM Passive Mate</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353991#M766952</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There should be different ip address assigned to the standby fwsm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you do: "sh run interface", from the output, you should see 2 ip addresses per interface. The second ip address would be the one assigned to the standby fwsm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface vlan 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 standby 1.1.1.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the above case, 1.1.1.2 is the standby ip address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353991#M766952</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-19T04:34:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SNMP Polling of FWSM Passive Mate</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353992#M766955</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ok so i will have to break the failover config first and apply -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Active Unit - 10.0.0.101 255.255.255.0 standby 10.0.0.100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Standby Unit - 10.0.0.102. 255.255.255.0 standby 10.0.0.100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the standby like a virtual interface?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:55:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353992#M766955</guid>
      <dc:creator>bradleyordner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-19T04:55:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SNMP Polling of FWSM Passive Mate</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353993#M766956</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, no..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For FWSM failover Active/Standby configuration, there will only be 2 ip addresses per interface, 1 active ip address and 1 standby ip address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configuration just needs to be configured on the active fwsm, and it will be automatically replicated to the standby fwsm if failover is configured.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the failover documentation on FWSM for your reference:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/fwsm/fwsm32/configuration/guide/fail_f.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/fwsm/fwsm32/configuration/guide/fail_f.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:59:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353993#M766956</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-19T04:59:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SNMP Polling of FWSM Passive Mate</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353994#M766957</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ah yes i just got it after reading a second time ha ha.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help looks good now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:06:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353994#M766957</guid>
      <dc:creator>bradleyordner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-19T05:06:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SNMP Polling of FWSM Passive Mate</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353995#M766958</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers. Thanks for your update.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/snmp-polling-of-fwsm-passive-mate/m-p/1353995#M766958</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-19T05:08:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

