<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAC - Cisco Rules in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-cisco-rules/m-p/1465856#M771393</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll follow up on that and update later on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faisal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 23:07:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Faisal Sehbai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-02T23:07:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAC - Cisco Rules</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-cisco-rules/m-p/1465853#M771306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've noticed the NAC is not receiving some of the critical windows vulnerabilities in April's Security Bulletin. The latest one I have is MS10-020 but what about 025, 026, and 027? Is there a reason why Cisco does not create the necessary rules for these vulnerabilities? These rules are listed as a critical severity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:56:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-cisco-rules/m-p/1465853#M771306</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpecarski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T11:56:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC - Cisco Rules</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-cisco-rules/m-p/1465854#M771332</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It takes a couple of days for the rules and checks to be updated for the latest. Please check in a couple of days, and if it's still missing we'll take it up with the dev team.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faisal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 03:49:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-cisco-rules/m-p/1465854#M771332</guid>
      <dc:creator>Faisal Sehbai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-01T03:49:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC - Cisco Rules</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-cisco-rules/m-p/1465855#M771375</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Faisal,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These patches were released by Microsoft over three weeks ago. Most customers I support begin patching usually a week afterwards and implement these checks in NAC a week or two after the deployment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you can look into this it would be appreciated. I really need to understand under what circumstances does Cisco create a rule for a specific hotfix. I realize they only address critical, but there are some critical patches listed in this thread which have not been addressed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 14:51:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-cisco-rules/m-p/1465855#M771375</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpecarski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-01T14:51:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC - Cisco Rules</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-cisco-rules/m-p/1465856#M771393</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll follow up on that and update later on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faisal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 23:07:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-cisco-rules/m-p/1465856#M771393</guid>
      <dc:creator>Faisal Sehbai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-02T23:07:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

