<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Comments on NAC 4.7.1 ???? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comments-on-nac-4-7-1/m-p/1299320#M772276</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have had the same problem with the disk failing to read. We burned the disk as low as we possibly could down to x8 speed, multiple disks through multiple burners and different burning software. Is there a recommened software/burner/speed combination? Its getting kind of tiring having to rebuild our CAS back to 4.7.0 every time the 4.7.1 upgrade fails.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:52:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bj2001holt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-30T22:52:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Comments on NAC 4.7.1 ????</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comments-on-nac-4-7-1/m-p/1299318#M772244</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Has anyone deployed it?&amp;nbsp; Is there any gotchas as opposed to 4.6.1?&amp;nbsp; I know it supports Windows 7 and Snow Leopard.&amp;nbsp; I had read that 4.7 only intruduuced FIPS compliance and disabled some of the functionality.&amp;nbsp; Look like I may have to go to it to support Windows 2008 64Bit AD for AD SSO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if you put this guy in.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:48:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comments-on-nac-4-7-1/m-p/1299318#M772244</guid>
      <dc:creator>manfernandez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T11:48:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Comments on NAC 4.7.1 ????</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comments-on-nac-4-7-1/m-p/1299319#M772254</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;One thing we're seeing at TAC quite a lot is that the install/upgrades failing due to CD problems. The ISO is pushing closer to 700 megs, so you have to make sure that you burn the CD at the slowest rate possible. With faster burn speeds problems happen reading it!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faisal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comments-on-nac-4-7-1/m-p/1299319#M772254</guid>
      <dc:creator>Faisal Sehbai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-02T04:14:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Comments on NAC 4.7.1 ????</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comments-on-nac-4-7-1/m-p/1299320#M772276</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have had the same problem with the disk failing to read. We burned the disk as low as we possibly could down to x8 speed, multiple disks through multiple burners and different burning software. Is there a recommened software/burner/speed combination? Its getting kind of tiring having to rebuild our CAS back to 4.7.0 every time the 4.7.1 upgrade fails.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:52:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comments-on-nac-4-7-1/m-p/1299320#M772276</guid>
      <dc:creator>bj2001holt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-30T22:52:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

