<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Confidential Network in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/confidential-network/m-p/1158932#M77320</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a way that we could restrict a desktop machine accessing any other system in the network ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if so will we be able to implement an encrypted communication between the end machines . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:35:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vineesh.viswanath</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:35:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Confidential Network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/confidential-network/m-p/1158932#M77320</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a way that we could restrict a desktop machine accessing any other system in the network ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if so will we be able to implement an encrypted communication between the end machines . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:35:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/confidential-network/m-p/1158932#M77320</guid>
      <dc:creator>vineesh.viswanath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:35:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confidential Network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/confidential-network/m-p/1158933#M77321</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;An IPS is not the device you want for this job.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For access restriction you should look at using VLANs, for encrypted communications you should set up a tunnel between the desktop VLAN and the destination VLAN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/confidential-network/m-p/1158933#M77321</guid>
      <dc:creator>rhermes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-06T18:15:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confidential Network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/confidential-network/m-p/1158934#M77322</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rhermes is correct; IPS is not the right solution.  You want VLANs and ACLs, potentially NAC but that's overkill.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  There are 3rd party products out that extend this as well, so if (for example) you permit a user to Remote Desktop or VNC from Desktop A to Server B, they're 'locked' into Server B and can't RDP out anywhere from there.  I think one solution was called Xceedium.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/confidential-network/m-p/1158934#M77322</guid>
      <dc:creator>clausonna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-07T18:01:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

