<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Identity Static NAT in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identity-static-nat/m-p/1265824#M778484</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I configured identity static NAT on my ASA specifying a range I.E. "static (inside,outside) 10.10.10.0 10.10.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 and now the outside users cannot connect to inside WEB server which has IP address of 10.10.10.51. Do I need to create one to one entries for each host? Seems like firewall does not create a dedicated translation for inbound connections. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:36:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jshakyan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T16:36:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Identity Static NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identity-static-nat/m-p/1265824#M778484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I configured identity static NAT on my ASA specifying a range I.E. "static (inside,outside) 10.10.10.0 10.10.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 and now the outside users cannot connect to inside WEB server which has IP address of 10.10.10.51. Do I need to create one to one entries for each host? Seems like firewall does not create a dedicated translation for inbound connections. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:36:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identity-static-nat/m-p/1265824#M778484</guid>
      <dc:creator>jshakyan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T16:36:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identity Static NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identity-static-nat/m-p/1265825#M778487</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no need for doing one to one nat for all the ip addresses. The configuration statement looks fine to me. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please check the output of 'show xlate' and find out if the translations are being made for the ip addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Manish  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:12:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identity-static-nat/m-p/1265825#M778487</guid>
      <dc:creator>mkharban</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-05T23:12:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identity Static NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identity-static-nat/m-p/1265826#M778495</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The order of the statics is important. Check the order.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:23:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identity-static-nat/m-p/1265826#M778495</guid>
      <dc:creator>kerstin-534</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T14:23:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

