topic Re: Stateful Failover and DHCP bindings in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/stateful-failover-and-dhcp-bindings/m-p/1291460#M779338 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>No. DHCPD bindings are NOT replicated to the standby unit.</P><P></P><P></P><P></P><P></P></BODY></HTML> Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:16:38 GMT Kureli Sankar 2009-10-26T14:16:38Z Stateful Failover and DHCP bindings https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/stateful-failover-and-dhcp-bindings/m-p/1291459#M779321 <P>Hello,</P><P></P><P>concers to FWSM, PIX, ASA5500series</P><P></P><P>in Active/Standby with Stateful Failover</P><P></P><P>I use the Firewall as DHCP Server.</P><P></P><P>Now I have several DHCP bindings on the Primary (active) Firewall.</P><P></P><P>Does the active Firwall copy the DHCP binding informations to the secondary?</P><P></P><P>So if there is a failover to the secondary - the old DHCP binding informations are not lost?</P> Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:30:43 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/stateful-failover-and-dhcp-bindings/m-p/1291459#M779321 Marcus Hunold 2019-03-11T16:30:43Z Re: Stateful Failover and DHCP bindings https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/stateful-failover-and-dhcp-bindings/m-p/1291460#M779338 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>No. DHCPD bindings are NOT replicated to the standby unit.</P><P></P><P></P><P></P><P></P></BODY></HTML> Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:16:38 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/stateful-failover-and-dhcp-bindings/m-p/1291460#M779338 Kureli Sankar 2009-10-26T14:16:38Z Re: Stateful Failover and DHCP bindings https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/stateful-failover-and-dhcp-bindings/m-p/1291461#M779390 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Thank you!</P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:45:03 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/stateful-failover-and-dhcp-bindings/m-p/1291461#M779390 Marcus Hunold 2009-10-27T07:45:03Z