<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAC Framework and CTA in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-framework-and-cta/m-p/1193427#M783080</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello JASON,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can use SSC with non-supplicant CTA in 802.1x NAC framework environment. You do not need to config EAPoUDP on switchports. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>APatotski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-24T06:13:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAC Framework and CTA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-framework-and-cta/m-p/1193426#M783049</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've had a NAC Framework test environment (ACS 4.0 &amp;amp; CTA 2.1) for a couple of years now. We finally have the green light to move forward into production so I'm bringing more machines into the lab for additional testing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I went to download the CTA again today as I couldn't find my original file and I see this in the 2.1 release notes (which I don't remember seeing before):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Cisco Secure Services Client (SSC) replaces the CTA 802.1x Wired Client as the preferred supplicant in a deployment of the NAC security solution. NAC is supported for use in a wired network environment."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So should I now download the non-supplicant version of CTA and use it with SSC? I'm not sure I see the benefit of that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Plus wouldn't that mean my switchports would need to be configured for both 802.1x and EAPoUDP for auth and posture respectively since the non-supplicant CTA doesn't use 802.1x like the supplicant version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The above is the reason I hadn't used the CTA on any Mac clients and just do 802.1x with no posture for them.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:20:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-framework-and-cta/m-p/1193426#M783049</guid>
      <dc:creator>jason.eberhard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T11:20:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC Framework and CTA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-framework-and-cta/m-p/1193427#M783080</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello JASON,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can use SSC with non-supplicant CTA in 802.1x NAC framework environment. You do not need to config EAPoUDP on switchports. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-framework-and-cta/m-p/1193427#M783080</guid>
      <dc:creator>APatotski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-24T06:13:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

