<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPS 4240 configuration question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-4240-configuration-question/m-p/1083518#M78310</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only way to communicate to your 4240 is via the management interface (ethernet) or via the console port (serial). The management interface allows you a lot more flexibility, ssh, IDM (the GUI interface), event feeds to a SIM platform (via SDEE protocol), and most importantly; software and signature updates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why would you want to place your IPS sensors OUTSIDE your firewall?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rhermes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-17T16:26:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPS 4240 configuration question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-4240-configuration-question/m-p/1083517#M78309</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a 4240 that is physically sitting in between my edge router and my ASA - One interface is connected to router and the other is connected to ASA.  I have confiured Inline Interface pair.  My question is to manage 4240, what option do I have?  I know using management interface is one option. However, due to security concern, they don't want to use management interface.  I was wondering if there is any other way I can manage.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:22:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-4240-configuration-question/m-p/1083517#M78309</guid>
      <dc:creator>peterhkim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:22:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS 4240 configuration question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-4240-configuration-question/m-p/1083518#M78310</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only way to communicate to your 4240 is via the management interface (ethernet) or via the console port (serial). The management interface allows you a lot more flexibility, ssh, IDM (the GUI interface), event feeds to a SIM platform (via SDEE protocol), and most importantly; software and signature updates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why would you want to place your IPS sensors OUTSIDE your firewall?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-4240-configuration-question/m-p/1083518#M78310</guid>
      <dc:creator>rhermes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-17T16:26:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS 4240 configuration question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-4240-configuration-question/m-p/1083519#M78312</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was their requirement putting IPS in between router and FW.  I guess I have to use management interface.  Thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:34:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-4240-configuration-question/m-p/1083519#M78312</guid>
      <dc:creator>peterhkim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-17T16:34:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

