<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NAC guest server physical Interfaces. in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-guest-server-physical-interfaces/m-p/1479210#M786763</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;We'll be implementing Cisco NAC guest server for Guest Wireless users, ( Model #3310),&amp;nbsp; the question is do we need to configure separate physical interface for User authentication requests( from Wireless ) and a separate&amp;nbsp; Interface for Guest server to talk to AD for SSO?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:01:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vishal.desai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T12:01:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAC guest server physical Interfaces.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-guest-server-physical-interfaces/m-p/1479210#M786763</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;We'll be implementing Cisco NAC guest server for Guest Wireless users, ( Model #3310),&amp;nbsp; the question is do we need to configure separate physical interface for User authentication requests( from Wireless ) and a separate&amp;nbsp; Interface for Guest server to talk to AD for SSO?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:01:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-guest-server-physical-interfaces/m-p/1479210#M786763</guid>
      <dc:creator>vishal.desai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T12:01:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC guest server physical Interfaces.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-guest-server-physical-interfaces/m-p/1479211#M786799</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vishal,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No. It uses the same interface for both.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faisal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:21:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-guest-server-physical-interfaces/m-p/1479211#M786799</guid>
      <dc:creator>Faisal Sehbai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-20T21:21:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC guest server physical Interfaces.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-guest-server-physical-interfaces/m-p/1479212#M786837</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why have 4 interfaces on these devices when you can only use 1? *shakes head* &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="confused" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/confused.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 08:02:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-guest-server-physical-interfaces/m-p/1479212#M786837</guid>
      <dc:creator>dperowne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-04T08:02:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

