<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Firewall v/s IPS in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-v-s-ips/m-p/1036045#M78761</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, During these days I am trying to understand IPS and IDS concepts. I just want to know how is different an IPS device from Firewall in the terms of traffic blocking as I know we can handle the traffic on ASA FW by using MPF then why we require IPS. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:18:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ray_stone</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:18:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firewall v/s IPS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-v-s-ips/m-p/1036045#M78761</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, During these days I am trying to understand IPS and IDS concepts. I just want to know how is different an IPS device from Firewall in the terms of traffic blocking as I know we can handle the traffic on ASA FW by using MPF then why we require IPS. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:18:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-v-s-ips/m-p/1036045#M78761</guid>
      <dc:creator>ray_stone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:18:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firewall v/s IPS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-v-s-ips/m-p/1036046#M78763</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The [firewall and IPS] products are converging, but generally an IPS is better at deep packet inspection and a firewall is better at pretty much everything else (they've been around a long time and are more mature).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specifically to the ASA, an ASA without the AIP-SSM (the IPS module) has deep packet inspection capabilities, but doesn't have thousands of built-in signatures, with new ones added as new vulnerabilities surface. It doesn't by default protect you from most application layer attacks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, here's how you can configure the ASA to defend against the "Microsoft Snapshot Viewer ActiveX Control Arbitrary File Upload Vulnerability".  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=16224" target="_blank"&gt;http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=16224&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unless you manually do this, you won't have protection.  If you have the IPS module, a signature update was released the same day and you're automatically protected:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewIpsSignature.x?signatureId=6968&amp;amp;signatureSubId=0&amp;amp;softwareVersion=6.0&amp;amp;releaseVersion=S343" target="_blank"&gt;http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewIpsSignature.x?signatureId=6968&amp;amp;signatureSubId=0&amp;amp;softwareVersion=6.0&amp;amp;releaseVersion=S343&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:40:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-v-s-ips/m-p/1036046#M78763</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhellman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-24T12:40:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

