<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAC in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac/m-p/1025708#M789438</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This kinda depends if you're going for a centralized or de-centralized design....depending on the number of users per site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could go for a 3310 in your central site (up to 500 users) and use ISR NAC modules or other 3310's in the branch offices...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Central site I would go for IB deployment and for the branch sites you can choose either OOB or IB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or just pop a 3350 in your central site and have all clients authenticated by that appliance..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;stefan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:21:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>steavg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-23T17:21:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac/m-p/1025707#M789437</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are about to embark on an MPLS rollout (in a hub and spoke configuration - all remote offices will connect to the main office for Internet).  We have about 1400 users.  Which NAC solution would be right for us:  3 500 user servers or 1 1500 user server?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:56:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac/m-p/1025707#M789437</guid>
      <dc:creator>msmrrobin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T10:56:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac/m-p/1025708#M789438</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This kinda depends if you're going for a centralized or de-centralized design....depending on the number of users per site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could go for a 3310 in your central site (up to 500 users) and use ISR NAC modules or other 3310's in the branch offices...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Central site I would go for IB deployment and for the branch sites you can choose either OOB or IB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or just pop a 3350 in your central site and have all clients authenticated by that appliance..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;stefan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:21:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac/m-p/1025708#M789438</guid>
      <dc:creator>steavg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-23T17:21:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac/m-p/1025709#M789439</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.  I would like to keep it centralized to keep the cost down.  I was considering the 3350, but our vendor was worried about the throughput between the NAC device and our Core switch (it's only 1Gbps).  I don't want to create any bottleneck issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:44:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac/m-p/1025709#M789439</guid>
      <dc:creator>msmrrobin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-23T17:44:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

