<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NATing Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nating-question/m-p/1357769#M790265</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is in the nonat acl?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you pls. paste the contents?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-KS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:25:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kureli Sankar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-27T14:25:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NATing Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nating-question/m-p/1357767#M790255</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I created a one-to-one NAT statement but when I try to ping the public ip address from the outside, it won't responde. Here is the NAT statement. Any assistance would be greatly apprecaited.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat(inside) 0 access-list nonat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat(inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 12.200.199.120 172.17.100.101 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;BR /&gt;static (inside,outside) 12.200.199.121 172.17.100.102 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 12.200.199.122 172.17.100.103 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group outside_access_in in interface outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sK&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:02:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nating-question/m-p/1357767#M790255</guid>
      <dc:creator>skhirbash</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T17:02:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NATing Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nating-question/m-p/1357768#M790260</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created a one-to-one NAT
statement but when I try to ping the public ip address from the
outside, it won't responde. Here is the NAT statement. Any assistance
would be greatly apprecaited.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat(inside) 0 access-list nonat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat(inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 12.200.199.120 172.17.100.101 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;BR /&gt;static (inside,outside) 12.200.199.121 172.17.100.102 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 12.200.199.122 172.17.100.103 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group outside_access_in in interface outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sK&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Sk,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check out the below link on nat configuuration on PIX firewall hope to help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a00800b6e1a.shtml"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a00800b6e1a.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ganesh.H&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:57:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nating-question/m-p/1357768#M790260</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ganesh Hariharan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T08:57:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NATing Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nating-question/m-p/1357769#M790265</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is in the nonat acl?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you pls. paste the contents?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-KS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:25:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nating-question/m-p/1357769#M790265</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kureli Sankar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T14:25:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NATing Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nating-question/m-p/1357770#M790269</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remeber NAT EXEMPT (nonat) takes higher precedence over static NAT and also nonat with ACL (on HIgher security-level ifc)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is bidirectional.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keeping that in mind, go ahead and check your nonat access-lists, an if they happen to include the interesting tarffic, then your public IPs WILL NOT repond.&amp;nbsp; Remove inetresting traffic from nonat ACL, and then your static NAT will take preference, allowing access for users from outside to the servers on inside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vijaya&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:57:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nating-question/m-p/1357770#M790269</guid>
      <dc:creator>vilaxmi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-28T15:57:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

