<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Generic SQL sig 5930/5 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/generic-sql-sig-5930-5/m-p/1046798#M79042</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, could you say that 5930 sigs are new with the "asprox" injection sig wrapped up in it (6964-0)....asprox botnet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shiznitide</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-25T20:22:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Generic SQL sig 5930/5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/generic-sql-sig-5930-5/m-p/1046796#M79037</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was reading some old posts that said signature -5930/5 "Generic SQL" is an old signature that has been re-released to include the "asprox" vulnerability.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;#1) can someone tell me when this sig was first released and has this always been 5930?  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;#2) Been seeing between 250-750 5930/5 attacks being blocked by this sig. several times a day.  If the sig was just added to my system not too long ago....does this mean that these attacks were not getting blocked before this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be great. Thanks for your time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:15:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/generic-sql-sig-5930-5/m-p/1046796#M79037</guid>
      <dc:creator>shiznitide</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:15:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Generic SQL sig 5930/5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/generic-sql-sig-5930-5/m-p/1046797#M79040</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) I believe the 5930 sigs are new.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) yes.  It doesn't mean they were successful though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:12:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/generic-sql-sig-5930-5/m-p/1046797#M79040</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhellman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-25T20:12:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Generic SQL sig 5930/5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/generic-sql-sig-5930-5/m-p/1046798#M79042</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, could you say that 5930 sigs are new with the "asprox" injection sig wrapped up in it (6964-0)....asprox botnet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/generic-sql-sig-5930-5/m-p/1046798#M79042</guid>
      <dc:creator>shiznitide</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-25T20:22:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Generic SQL sig 5930/5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/generic-sql-sig-5930-5/m-p/1046799#M79044</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm just saying that I don't believe they existed before.  There are variations of the asprox worm, so they could be looking for different patterns (I believe 6964-0 is more specific than the 5930 sigs, hence the "generic" reference).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:01:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/generic-sql-sig-5930-5/m-p/1046799#M79044</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhellman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-25T21:01:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Generic SQL sig 5930/5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/generic-sql-sig-5930-5/m-p/1046800#M79045</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;6964-0 is a more specific signature released to address the asprox worm, however as mhellman stated, there are variations of it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5930-x is a suite of generic signatures created to catch sql injection attempts. Some initially release in s349 and the -6 subsignature released in s353. We'll add more as needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5930-5 will fire on the asprox worm (as would sig 6964-0) as well as many of its variations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:57:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/generic-sql-sig-5930-5/m-p/1046800#M79045</guid>
      <dc:creator>wsulym</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-26T11:57:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

