<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CSA, CCA, NAC, CTA and their Role in Security in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/csa-cca-nac-cta-and-their-role-in-security/m-p/356978#M790648</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Naman -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are right-on with you descriptions.  I am adding some more description to see if this can help you further.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;CSA&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - HIPS to reduce risk worms, viruses, spyware&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - Security Policy enforcement to implement Organizations' Security Policy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;NAC&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - Industry Collaborative Effort (Trend Micro, McAfee, Symantec, CA, IBM and many others to come)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - enables Trust determination of end-points connecting to network devices to ensure minimimum technical requirements are met&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      - Phase 1 - check for Service Packs, Hotfixes, AV and/or CSA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - support IOS Routers / VPN concentrator today&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    - can be at any L3 hop within network&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - additional device support in future (FW, AP, Switches)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - users are limited by their Trust level to resources&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - users may receive a web page redirect to help fix their compliance issues  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;Cisco Clean Access&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - Cisco-only implementation of NAC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - Trust determination done before user can communicate to any device on subnet or network&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - CCA permits checking for HF/SP, PFW, AV, Spyware Cleaners, HIPs, custom application presence, etc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - users can be forced to comply with above policies before accessing network and are informed by Web Page redirects&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - works with any existing network implementation, regardless of equipment manfacturor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCA and NAC are similar in they are 2 different ways to determine Trust before users can access the network.  NAC and CCA can be deployed seperately or together, depending on the customers network and requirements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It makes sense that we may see NAC using CCA as a policy server to add additional flexability to the Trust determination of the end points.  This has not happened yet nor do I know if it is planned yet since the acquisistion of Perfigo is still pretty recent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:01:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pcomeaux</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-03-25T19:01:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CSA, CCA, NAC, CTA and their Role in Security</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/csa-cca-nac-cta-and-their-role-in-security/m-p/356977#M790642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to understand the role played by the above components in a secure network as defined by Cisco. As per my understanding&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CSA--&amp;gt;Provides Host-based IPS\IDS capabilities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CTA\NAC--&amp;gt;Both work together to determine, if a Client is running the necassary SW, follows a certain policy ect. Then the Client is denied\allowed Access&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCA -&amp;gt; If a Client is determined to be infected\non-compliant then CCA can take actions to fix that without User-Intervention.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I corret for the above statements ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any similarities between CCA and CTA\NAC solution ? Is there an overlap between these two solutions ? OR Are these designed to work together to deliver more features ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks \\ Naman&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:02:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/csa-cca-nac-cta-and-their-role-in-security/m-p/356977#M790642</guid>
      <dc:creator>mnlatif</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:02:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSA, CCA, NAC, CTA and their Role in Security</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/csa-cca-nac-cta-and-their-role-in-security/m-p/356978#M790648</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Naman -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are right-on with you descriptions.  I am adding some more description to see if this can help you further.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;CSA&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - HIPS to reduce risk worms, viruses, spyware&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - Security Policy enforcement to implement Organizations' Security Policy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;NAC&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - Industry Collaborative Effort (Trend Micro, McAfee, Symantec, CA, IBM and many others to come)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - enables Trust determination of end-points connecting to network devices to ensure minimimum technical requirements are met&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      - Phase 1 - check for Service Packs, Hotfixes, AV and/or CSA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - support IOS Routers / VPN concentrator today&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    - can be at any L3 hop within network&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - additional device support in future (FW, AP, Switches)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - users are limited by their Trust level to resources&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - users may receive a web page redirect to help fix their compliance issues  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;Cisco Clean Access&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - Cisco-only implementation of NAC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - Trust determination done before user can communicate to any device on subnet or network&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - CCA permits checking for HF/SP, PFW, AV, Spyware Cleaners, HIPs, custom application presence, etc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - users can be forced to comply with above policies before accessing network and are informed by Web Page redirects&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - works with any existing network implementation, regardless of equipment manfacturor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCA and NAC are similar in they are 2 different ways to determine Trust before users can access the network.  NAC and CCA can be deployed seperately or together, depending on the customers network and requirements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It makes sense that we may see NAC using CCA as a policy server to add additional flexability to the Trust determination of the end points.  This has not happened yet nor do I know if it is planned yet since the acquisistion of Perfigo is still pretty recent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:01:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/csa-cca-nac-cta-and-their-role-in-security/m-p/356978#M790648</guid>
      <dc:creator>pcomeaux</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-25T19:01:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

