<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FWSM failover: Context State after failover is FAILED,why ? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-context-state-after-failover-is-failed-why/m-p/1283055#M792643</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi every one,we have two FWSM in our 6509 switches,fwsm's are in multiple context mode and are configured for active/active.we have two context= admin and public.here is detail:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FWSM-1=admin(active) public(standby)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FWSM-2=admin(standby) public(active)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so recently for some reason we had failover for FWSM-1 but now every thing is normal except that in fwsm-1 admin is active that shuld be BUT context public which should be in standby-ready is in FAILED state,why?is this for last failover? and now if fwsm-2 fails what would happen?fwsm-1 wont take active rule? consider this that in fwsm-1 context admin monitored interfaces are normal but in fwsm-1 context public all monitored interfaces are in failed state just as context state?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:23:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>blackhat2020</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T16:23:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FWSM failover: Context State after failover is FAILED,why ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-context-state-after-failover-is-failed-why/m-p/1283055#M792643</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi every one,we have two FWSM in our 6509 switches,fwsm's are in multiple context mode and are configured for active/active.we have two context= admin and public.here is detail:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FWSM-1=admin(active) public(standby)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FWSM-2=admin(standby) public(active)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so recently for some reason we had failover for FWSM-1 but now every thing is normal except that in fwsm-1 admin is active that shuld be BUT context public which should be in standby-ready is in FAILED state,why?is this for last failover? and now if fwsm-2 fails what would happen?fwsm-1 wont take active rule? consider this that in fwsm-1 context admin monitored interfaces are normal but in fwsm-1 context public all monitored interfaces are in failed state just as context state?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:23:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-context-state-after-failover-is-failed-why/m-p/1283055#M792643</guid>
      <dc:creator>blackhat2020</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T16:23:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM failover: Context State after failover is FAILED,why ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-context-state-after-failover-is-failed-why/m-p/1283056#M792675</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;please,i need your advise!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:26:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-context-state-after-failover-is-failed-why/m-p/1283056#M792675</guid>
      <dc:creator>blackhat2020</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-07T09:26:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

