<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Windows DCOM Overflow (Internal Servers) in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/windows-dcom-overflow-internal-servers/m-p/994491#M79577</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've just received these new appliances and I've been trying to make heads or tails of messages received about "attacks". &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the message that I'm getting &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Windows DCOM Overflow 5588/0 192.168.3.34 192.168.1.7 droppedPacket, deniedFlow, tcpOneWayResetSent 445 60 95 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a DC and five Satellite Servers and there all on a VPN and they replicate. This is a constent "attack" that I'm getting. I've made filters to make sure that the Network IP's in question are exempt from this signature. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also did a DCdiag on the Domain Controler. This is not the only signature that I get that my DC is "attacking" other IP's within the Network....Here's my device and versions.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IPS ver. 6.1(1) E2 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Device Type: ASA-SSM 10 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASDM= ASA Ver. 8.0 (2) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Device Type: ASA5510 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASDM ver 6.0(2) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that it can't be anything that is making the Servers comprimised, but I'm trying to narrow this down. I really don't want to disable the signature for fear of allowing anything from the outside coming in. My gut feeling is that its a false positive anyone else have this issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Same issue with a sig firing of 3337/0 Windows RPC Race condition....This one is firing from my DC to my sattelite office servers....All are healthy btw. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:10:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bittowolf</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:10:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Windows DCOM Overflow (Internal Servers)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/windows-dcom-overflow-internal-servers/m-p/994491#M79577</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've just received these new appliances and I've been trying to make heads or tails of messages received about "attacks". &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the message that I'm getting &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Windows DCOM Overflow 5588/0 192.168.3.34 192.168.1.7 droppedPacket, deniedFlow, tcpOneWayResetSent 445 60 95 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a DC and five Satellite Servers and there all on a VPN and they replicate. This is a constent "attack" that I'm getting. I've made filters to make sure that the Network IP's in question are exempt from this signature. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also did a DCdiag on the Domain Controler. This is not the only signature that I get that my DC is "attacking" other IP's within the Network....Here's my device and versions.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IPS ver. 6.1(1) E2 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Device Type: ASA-SSM 10 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASDM= ASA Ver. 8.0 (2) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Device Type: ASA5510 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASDM ver 6.0(2) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that it can't be anything that is making the Servers comprimised, but I'm trying to narrow this down. I really don't want to disable the signature for fear of allowing anything from the outside coming in. My gut feeling is that its a false positive anyone else have this issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Same issue with a sig firing of 3337/0 Windows RPC Race condition....This one is firing from my DC to my sattelite office servers....All are healthy btw. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:10:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/windows-dcom-overflow-internal-servers/m-p/994491#M79577</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bittowolf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:10:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Windows DCOM Overflow (Internal Servers)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/windows-dcom-overflow-internal-servers/m-p/994492#M79580</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Download the latest signature update, AFAIR they just tuned this signature in the last release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Farrukh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:28:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/windows-dcom-overflow-internal-servers/m-p/994492#M79580</guid>
      <dc:creator>Farrukh Haroon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-06T10:28:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Windows DCOM Overflow (Internal Servers)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/windows-dcom-overflow-internal-servers/m-p/994493#M79582</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;looks like a true positive. try to check whether the source has been patch. if it haven't most likely it has been infected ,etc &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:21:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/windows-dcom-overflow-internal-servers/m-p/994493#M79582</guid>
      <dc:creator>yuliang13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-21T06:21:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

