<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAC with EV SSL certs in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ev-ssl-certs/m-p/1439653#M797270</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ben,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Higher key lengths shouldn't be a problem. Any other pertinent data points?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faisal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Faisal Sehbai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-19T13:27:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAC with EV SSL certs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ev-ssl-certs/m-p/1439650#M797222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if the NAC appliance supports EV SSL certs; especially version v4.7.x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insight into older versions (4.1.3 and higher) for compatibility would be appreciated. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ben&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:01:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ev-ssl-certs/m-p/1439650#M797222</guid>
      <dc:creator>IP Xpert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T12:01:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC with EV SSL certs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ev-ssl-certs/m-p/1439651#M797226</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ben,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not familiar with those. What's the difference between the EV certs and a regular SSL cert?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faisal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ev-ssl-certs/m-p/1439651#M797226</guid>
      <dc:creator>Faisal Sehbai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-15T13:02:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC with EV SSL certs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ev-ssl-certs/m-p/1439652#M797243</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apparently a few things but notably for the NAC the CSR has a stronger key (1024 bit and higher).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 05:10:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ev-ssl-certs/m-p/1439652#M797243</guid>
      <dc:creator>IP Xpert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-16T05:10:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC with EV SSL certs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ev-ssl-certs/m-p/1439653#M797270</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ben,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Higher key lengths shouldn't be a problem. Any other pertinent data points?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faisal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ev-ssl-certs/m-p/1439653#M797270</guid>
      <dc:creator>Faisal Sehbai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-19T13:27:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC with EV SSL certs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ev-ssl-certs/m-p/1439654#M797301</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello! The higher key length is a problem on an older version (4.1.3), not 4.7.x; etc where you can specify it. 4.1.3 you cannot specify it and it's not strong enough. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ben&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:16:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-with-ev-ssl-certs/m-p/1439654#M797301</guid>
      <dc:creator>IP Xpert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-19T19:16:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

