<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NAT VS NAT-T in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-vs-nat-t/m-p/1360767#M799002</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the difference between NAT &amp;amp; NAt Traversal?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ganesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ganesh gandhi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T16:46:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAT VS NAT-T</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-vs-nat-t/m-p/1360767#M799002</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the difference between NAT &amp;amp; NAt Traversal?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ganesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-vs-nat-t/m-p/1360767#M799002</guid>
      <dc:creator>ganesh gandhi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T16:46:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT VS NAT-T</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-vs-nat-t/m-p/1360768#M799049</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;NAT is the function of translating an ip address into another address, NAT-T is a function that is negotiated in IPSec to enable vpn tunnels to be established through nat using udp port 4500 encapsulation of ipsec data, NAT-T differs from legacy Cisco UDP encapsulation by being an open standard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:59:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-vs-nat-t/m-p/1360768#M799049</guid>
      <dc:creator>jan.nielsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-09T13:59:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT VS NAT-T</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-vs-nat-t/m-p/1360769#M799074</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply Jan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:41:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-vs-nat-t/m-p/1360769#M799074</guid>
      <dc:creator>ganesh gandhi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-09T14:41:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

