<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAC Manager in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-manager/m-p/789772#M806552</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks mate, but this will not work for me as am looking at getting two more 3350's as time goes and then this justifies having a manager not a manager for one Appliance.cause the NAM is quite pricey just to manage one appliance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:26:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tmailula</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-16T18:26:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAC Manager</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-manager/m-p/789770#M806444</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to deploy the NAC Appliance for 1500 users on my network,just wanted to get clarity as to why do i need the NAC manager for 20 NAC Appliances if am only deploying one NAC Appliance. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:38:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-manager/m-p/789770#M806444</guid>
      <dc:creator>tmailula</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T09:38:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC Manager</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-manager/m-p/789771#M806490</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;At one CAS-1500 you require a standard NAM.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The standard hardware also includes the SSL accelerator card due to the performance needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6128/prod_bulletin0900aecd805d0358.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6128/prod_bulletin0900aecd805d0358.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you had 3 CAS 500s then you should be able to get away with a NAM Lite.  And really you would be better off performance wise if you used the standard hardware.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:12:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-manager/m-p/789771#M806490</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bradley Spencer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-16T16:12:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC Manager</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-manager/m-p/789772#M806552</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks mate, but this will not work for me as am looking at getting two more 3350's as time goes and then this justifies having a manager not a manager for one Appliance.cause the NAM is quite pricey just to manage one appliance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:26:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nac-manager/m-p/789772#M806552</guid>
      <dc:creator>tmailula</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-16T18:26:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

