topic Re: Static Destination Policy NAT in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-destination-policy-nat/m-p/1331213#M824558 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Unfortunately, it is not do-able. The FWSM will complain for "mapped-address conflict".</P><P></P><P>PK</P><P></P></BODY></HTML> Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:06:49 GMT Panos Kampanakis 2009-10-29T17:06:49Z Static Destination Policy NAT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-destination-policy-nat/m-p/1331212#M824548 <P>Hi all, </P><P>I'm trying to define if implementing policy based destination NAT on FWSM is possible. I found several examples of policy NAT but it seems that it only applies to source. I did tests on a router and I am quite sure it is not possible, but now i need to implement this on a FWSM:</P><P></P><P>- when SRCX comes in from outside directed to DST (reachable through inside), I want to nat DST in DSTX</P><P>- when SRCY comes in from outside directed to DST (reachable through inside), I want to nat DST in DSTY</P><P>- all other SRC -&gt; DST cases unchanged</P><P></P><P>Is it possible? How?</P><P></P><P>Thanks a lot</P><P>Chiara </P> Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:34:07 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-destination-policy-nat/m-p/1331212#M824548 CSCO10235163 2019-03-11T16:34:07Z Re: Static Destination Policy NAT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-destination-policy-nat/m-p/1331213#M824558 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Unfortunately, it is not do-able. The FWSM will complain for "mapped-address conflict".</P><P></P><P>PK</P><P></P></BODY></HTML> Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:06:49 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-destination-policy-nat/m-p/1331213#M824558 Panos Kampanakis 2009-10-29T17:06:49Z