<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAT vs PAT in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-vs-pat/m-p/1297338#M838422</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have anyother IP addresses available other than the "outside" ip address??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If not - a possible solution would still be to PAT, but write an acl that only allows these 3 users to access the external site.  Then you only have to give the provide the external IP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is not ideal - but it is a solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>andrew.prince</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-01T09:27:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAT vs PAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-vs-pat/m-p/1297337#M838421</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I Have ASA 5510 and I have a limited number of Real IPs, I need to get 3 of my users an access to a service whose their providers asked me for their real IPs to add them to their Access List.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually I want to use PATing instead of NATing for this purpose because I do not have enough Real IPs to give it to them.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:11:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-vs-pat/m-p/1297337#M838421</guid>
      <dc:creator>m.metwally</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T16:11:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT vs PAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-vs-pat/m-p/1297338#M838422</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have anyother IP addresses available other than the "outside" ip address??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If not - a possible solution would still be to PAT, but write an acl that only allows these 3 users to access the external site.  Then you only have to give the provide the external IP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is not ideal - but it is a solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-vs-pat/m-p/1297338#M838422</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrew.prince</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-01T09:27:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

