<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA Management interface for Failover in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-management-interface-for-failover/m-p/1320022#M839860</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Daniel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my experience, it is perfectly fine to use the management interface for failover communication. Just be sure to disable management-only mode with the 'no management-only' command on that interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:05:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>robertson.michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-22T18:05:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA Management interface for Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-management-interface-for-failover/m-p/1320021#M839859</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have been using the management0/0 interface for the failover process with success. I have a co-worker who claims this to not be a good idea. Has anyone heard of any definitive information for or against this practice?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:46:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-management-interface-for-failover/m-p/1320021#M839859</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Smith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T15:46:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA Management interface for Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-management-interface-for-failover/m-p/1320022#M839860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Daniel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my experience, it is perfectly fine to use the management interface for failover communication. Just be sure to disable management-only mode with the 'no management-only' command on that interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:05:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-management-interface-for-failover/m-p/1320022#M839860</guid>
      <dc:creator>robertson.michael</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-22T18:05:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA Management interface for Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-management-interface-for-failover/m-p/1320023#M839861</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no real difference between the management and normal ethernet interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:27:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-management-interface-for-failover/m-p/1320023#M839861</guid>
      <dc:creator>plumbis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-26T02:27:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

