topic Re: MARS slow performance after latest patch? in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mars-slow-performance-after-latest-patch/m-p/832999#M85052 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>In our case, it was some bug with NAT sessionization. We have Checkpoint devices, but I'm not sure if it's limited to CP or any NAT device. Turning NAT sessionization off really boosted performance. Our pnparser CPU utilization went from &gt;70% to &lt;30%. It's a per device DB setting, so Cisco has to do it.</P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:33:05 GMT mhellman 2007-12-21T19:33:05Z MARS slow performance after latest patch? https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mars-slow-performance-after-latest-patch/m-p/832998#M85047 <P>I just moved our small MARS 50 to 4.3.2 and we're still crawling. The GUI is ungodly slow, is anyone else still having this issue? I saw a lot of complaints of MARS in regards to the 4.3.1 code, I'm not seeing much an improvement to 4.3.2.</P><P></P><P>Anyone else relate or have advice for me other than frequest reboots?</P> Sun, 10 Mar 2019 10:54:55 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mars-slow-performance-after-latest-patch/m-p/832998#M85047 nykoelle01 2019-03-10T10:54:55Z Re: MARS slow performance after latest patch? https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mars-slow-performance-after-latest-patch/m-p/832999#M85052 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>In our case, it was some bug with NAT sessionization. We have Checkpoint devices, but I'm not sure if it's limited to CP or any NAT device. Turning NAT sessionization off really boosted performance. Our pnparser CPU utilization went from &gt;70% to &lt;30%. It's a per device DB setting, so Cisco has to do it.</P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:33:05 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mars-slow-performance-after-latest-patch/m-p/832999#M85052 mhellman 2007-12-21T19:33:05Z