topic Re: Noisy Sig 3337 in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/noisy-sig-3337/m-p/878760#M85587 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Can you divulge the cirumstances of this false positive?</P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:14:53 GMT pgwamendola 2008-07-16T18:14:53Z Noisy Sig 3337 https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/noisy-sig-3337/m-p/878757#M85583 <P>After the most recent sig tune (S303) I'm see a fair amount of activity from sig 3337. </P><P></P><P>Anyone else?</P><P></P> Sun, 10 Mar 2019 10:49:11 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/noisy-sig-3337/m-p/878757#M85583 mcvosi 2019-03-10T10:49:11Z Re: Noisy Sig 3337 https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/noisy-sig-3337/m-p/878758#M85585 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>We've identified a false positive for signature 3337-0 in S303. As a work around for signature 3337-0 apply the following tuning to the signature:</P><P></P><P>specify-operation: yes</P><P>operation: 0</P><P></P><P></P><P>At present we are building S304 which addresses this issue.</P></BODY></HTML> Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:26:24 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/noisy-sig-3337/m-p/878758#M85585 craiwill 2007-10-04T14:26:24Z Re: Noisy Sig 3337 https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/noisy-sig-3337/m-p/878759#M85586 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Can you divulge the circumstances of the false positive?</P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:13:48 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/noisy-sig-3337/m-p/878759#M85586 pgwamendola 2008-07-16T18:13:48Z Re: Noisy Sig 3337 https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/noisy-sig-3337/m-p/878760#M85587 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Can you divulge the cirumstances of this false positive?</P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:14:53 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/noisy-sig-3337/m-p/878760#M85587 pgwamendola 2008-07-16T18:14:53Z