<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MS07-042 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ms07-042/m-p/714132#M85899</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, I don't believe there are any signatures directly or indirectly available to detect attacks relating to this vulnerability (which is a shame).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>attmidsteam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-22T15:01:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MS07-042</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ms07-042/m-p/714131#M85898</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Has a signature been released to detect exploitation of the Microsoft vulnerability MS07-042?  Public exploit code is available...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 10:45:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ms07-042/m-p/714131#M85898</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpeadro80</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T10:45:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MS07-042</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ms07-042/m-p/714132#M85899</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, I don't believe there are any signatures directly or indirectly available to detect attacks relating to this vulnerability (which is a shame).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ms07-042/m-p/714132#M85899</guid>
      <dc:creator>attmidsteam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-22T15:01:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MS07-042</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ms07-042/m-p/714133#M85900</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone else feel this is completely unacceptable from a company such as Cisco?  Other IDS vendors  had sigs out last week.  What's the deal Cisco?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:02:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ms07-042/m-p/714133#M85900</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpeadro80</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-22T17:02:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

