<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Bidirectional NAT works, but..... in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bidirectional-nat-works-but/m-p/1279420#M859351</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jon, below is from cisco.com&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"outside (Optional) If this interface is on a lower security level than the interface you identify by the matching global statement, then you must enter outside. This feature is called outside NAT or bidirectional NAT."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anyway, you think by applying the statements in different order could be the issue? I'm trying to ping a device on the outside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will give it a try..thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:17:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>opers13</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-16T09:17:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bidirectional NAT works, but.....</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bidirectional-nat-works-but/m-p/1279418#M859347</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;with my last post, I got bidirectional nat to work from outside -&amp;gt; inside. Config below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (inside) 99 10.153.99.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (outside) 99 10.148.12.0 255.255.255.0 outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, the problem is getting NAT to work from inside -&amp;gt; outside. This is the error message:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;%ASA-3-305005: No translation group found for icmp src inside:10.153.13.18 dst....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So when I config the following everything breaks: (meaning NAT in any direction stops working)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 10.153.0.0 255.255.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat-control is disabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bidirectional-nat-works-but/m-p/1279418#M859347</guid>
      <dc:creator>opers13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T15:43:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bidirectional NAT works, but.....</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bidirectional-nat-works-but/m-p/1279419#M859349</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (inside) 99 10.153.99.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (outside) 99 10.148.12.0 255.255.255.0 outside &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this not bi-directional NAT. What it does is translate any incoming 10.148.12.x address on the outside to 10.153.99.1 on the inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regardless, i'm not sure why your'e other nat is not working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) removing both NAT statements. Then apply &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 10.153.0.0 255.255.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 interface &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and then &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (inside) 99 10.153.99.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (outside) 99 10.148.12.0 255.255.255.0 outside &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't forget to do a clear xlate when you make NAT changes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also your ping, what device are you pinging and is it located on the outside of the ASA ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bidirectional-nat-works-but/m-p/1279419#M859349</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-16T09:06:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bidirectional NAT works, but.....</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bidirectional-nat-works-but/m-p/1279420#M859351</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jon, below is from cisco.com&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"outside (Optional) If this interface is on a lower security level than the interface you identify by the matching global statement, then you must enter outside. This feature is called outside NAT or bidirectional NAT."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anyway, you think by applying the statements in different order could be the issue? I'm trying to ping a device on the outside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will give it a try..thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:17:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bidirectional-nat-works-but/m-p/1279420#M859351</guid>
      <dc:creator>opers13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-16T09:17:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bidirectional NAT works, but.....</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bidirectional-nat-works-but/m-p/1279421#M859352</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I stand corrected &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; - +5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:22:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bidirectional-nat-works-but/m-p/1279421#M859352</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-16T09:22:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bidirectional NAT works, but.....</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bidirectional-nat-works-but/m-p/1279422#M859353</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;got this to work with the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enabled same-security level:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;same-security-traffic permit inter-interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Changed security-level from 0 to 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Ethernet0/2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; speed 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; duplex full&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; nameif test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; security-level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ip address 10.153.0.205 255.255.255.252&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Added NAT 0:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (test) 0 access-list nonat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list nonat extended permit ip any any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:52:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bidirectional-nat-works-but/m-p/1279422#M859353</guid>
      <dc:creator>opers13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-22T17:52:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

