<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Using PAT for many users in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-pat-for-many-users/m-p/1189438#M860445</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jon! Well, I have to tell you that our first test for the firewall replacement, replacing the Symantec with the ASA, went 99% flawlessly on Friday night. I was very pleased with the way it went. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:30:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John Blakley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-04-27T13:30:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using PAT for many users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-pat-for-many-users/m-p/1189436#M860443</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there documentation somewhere that states how many users can run behind pat? I've got between 300 - 1000 at any one time that can be on, and currently I'm using the interface address on the asa to do this with. I was wondering if I needed to set aside a couple more addresses to go out on, or if I should be okay with this many users. It's a 5550.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-pat-for-many-users/m-p/1189436#M860443</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Blakley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T15:24:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using PAT for many users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-pat-for-many-users/m-p/1189437#M860444</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you know PAT uses the port number in addition to changing the IP address to hide the private address. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The port field in the IP header is a 16bit unsigned integer. This means the value of the port field can be 0 -&amp;gt; 65535. Take away the ports between 0 and 1024 and you still have an awful lot of port numbers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's not quite as simple as that as a single user may generate a large number of PAT translations depending on the application and how it works. But i would think you should be okay as i have run far more than 1000 users through a firewall with a single IP address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the firewall does run out it should tell you anyway by reporting that it has no available xlate for the connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:26:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-pat-for-many-users/m-p/1189437#M860444</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-27T13:26:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using PAT for many users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-pat-for-many-users/m-p/1189438#M860445</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jon! Well, I have to tell you that our first test for the firewall replacement, replacing the Symantec with the ASA, went 99% flawlessly on Friday night. I was very pleased with the way it went. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:30:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-pat-for-many-users/m-p/1189438#M860445</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Blakley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-27T13:30:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using PAT for many users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-pat-for-many-users/m-p/1189439#M860446</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"I have to tell you that our first test for the firewall replacement, replacing the Symantec with the ASA, went 99% flawlessly on Friday night"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's very impressive as translating configs between different vendor firewalls is never easy. Glad to hear it went so well, with the added bonus that you now know a whole lot more about Cisco ASA's &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:32:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-pat-for-many-users/m-p/1189439#M860446</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-27T13:32:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

