<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic gigabit interfaces on 5510 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/gigabit-interfaces-on-5510/m-p/1227633#M860749</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;According to the following documentation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm reading that my 5510, which has the Security Plus License, should have 2 interfaces capable of gigabit speed, but when I look at my ASA's interface's hardware properties in the gui, they are only capable of 100mb.  When I look at them from the cli, they indicate a BW of 1000MB, but the speed auto negotiated with a 3820's gigabit interface, which is also set to auto, is only 100mb.  However, I do notice the BW is set to 100000 on the 3820.  Could that be what's preventing the gig interfaces from negotiating gig speed?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interface Ethernet0/0 "outside", is up, line protocol is up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Hardware is i82546GB rev03, BW 1000 Mbps, DLY 10 usec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	Auto-Duplex(Full-duplex), Auto-Speed(100 Mbps)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking to give a customer, who is currently terminated in a DMZ interface gigabit speed and was wondering if I could just rename either the inside or outside interface so it could swap with the current DMZ interface.  Is it possible to just rename eth 0/0, or is there a hard rule that 0/0 must be the outside and e 0/1 must be the inside?  And can anyone verify that the 5510 is in fact capable of having gig interfaces?  I'm running 8.0(3)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:19:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WILLIAM STEGMAN</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T15:19:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>gigabit interfaces on 5510</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/gigabit-interfaces-on-5510/m-p/1227633#M860749</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;According to the following documentation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm reading that my 5510, which has the Security Plus License, should have 2 interfaces capable of gigabit speed, but when I look at my ASA's interface's hardware properties in the gui, they are only capable of 100mb.  When I look at them from the cli, they indicate a BW of 1000MB, but the speed auto negotiated with a 3820's gigabit interface, which is also set to auto, is only 100mb.  However, I do notice the BW is set to 100000 on the 3820.  Could that be what's preventing the gig interfaces from negotiating gig speed?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interface Ethernet0/0 "outside", is up, line protocol is up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Hardware is i82546GB rev03, BW 1000 Mbps, DLY 10 usec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	Auto-Duplex(Full-duplex), Auto-Speed(100 Mbps)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking to give a customer, who is currently terminated in a DMZ interface gigabit speed and was wondering if I could just rename either the inside or outside interface so it could swap with the current DMZ interface.  Is it possible to just rename eth 0/0, or is there a hard rule that 0/0 must be the outside and e 0/1 must be the inside?  And can anyone verify that the 5510 is in fact capable of having gig interfaces?  I'm running 8.0(3)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:19:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/gigabit-interfaces-on-5510/m-p/1227633#M860749</guid>
      <dc:creator>WILLIAM STEGMAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T15:19:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: gigabit interfaces on 5510</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/gigabit-interfaces-on-5510/m-p/1227634#M860751</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The model should support it. What do you see if you do a "sh ver"? Also, there's not set rule that a certain interface be the outside, but I need to warn you. If you have any static nat, routes, anything that references the inside or outside interface and you swap them, the configs will change. Make a good backup of your config before changing the names with the nameif command.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may want to try to hard set the interface on the switch and the ASA to see if it will connect correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:21:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/gigabit-interfaces-on-5510/m-p/1227634#M860751</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Blakley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-16T20:21:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: gigabit interfaces on 5510</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/gigabit-interfaces-on-5510/m-p/1227635#M860757</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I couldn't see anything in sh ver that might have helped.  I'll try hardcoding the speed and change the bw on my router to 1 gb and see what happens.  Thanks for the feedback on the renaming of the interfaces.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.0(3)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Device Manager Version 6.1(5)51&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Compiled on Tue 06-Nov-07 22:59 by builders&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;System image file is "disk0:/asa803-k8.bin"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Config file at boot was "startup-config"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HBG-ASA up 33 days 12 hours&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hardware:   ASA5510, 256 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 4 Celeron 1600 MHz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Internal ATA Compact Flash, 256MB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BIOS Flash M50FW080 @ 0xffe00000, 1024KB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Encryption hardware device : Cisco ASA-55x0 on-board accelerator (revision 0x0)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                             Boot microcode   : CN1000-MC-BOOT-2.00&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                             SSL/IKE microcode: CNLite-MC-SSLm-PLUS-2.01&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                             IPSec microcode  : CNlite-MC-IPSECm-MAIN-2.04&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 0: Ext: Ethernet0/0         : address is 001f.6c3d.f3a8, irq 9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 1: Ext: Ethernet0/1         : address is 001f.6c3d.f3a9, irq 9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 2: Ext: Ethernet0/2         : address is 001f.6c3d.f3aa, irq 9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 3: Ext: Ethernet0/3         : address is 001f.6c3d.f3ab, irq 9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 4: Ext: Management0/0       : address is 001f.6c3d.f3a7, irq 11&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 5: Int: Not used            : irq 11&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 6: Int: Not used            : irq 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Licensed features for this platform:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maximum Physical Interfaces  : Unlimited&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maximum VLANs                : 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inside Hosts                 : Unlimited&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Failover                     : Active/Active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VPN-DES                      : Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VPN-3DES-AES                 : Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Security Contexts            : 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;GTP/GPRS                     : Disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VPN Peers                    : 250&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WebVPN Peers                 : 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AnyConnect for Mobile        : Disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AnyConnect for Linksys phone : Disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Advanced Endpoint Assessment : Disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This platform has an ASA 5510 Security Plus license.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:21:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/gigabit-interfaces-on-5510/m-p/1227635#M860757</guid>
      <dc:creator>WILLIAM STEGMAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-17T00:21:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: gigabit interfaces on 5510</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/gigabit-interfaces-on-5510/m-p/1227636#M860765</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Instead of setting interface to auto mode, try setting speed to 1000 both in router and ASA. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Normally, if auto-negotiation fails the device will set to its default, that might be a issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:57:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/gigabit-interfaces-on-5510/m-p/1227636#M860765</guid>
      <dc:creator>roshan.maskey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-17T02:57:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

