<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Communication Between ASA Multiple Contexts in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235745#M861324</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Absolutely. I would create a new DMZ for each customer. Use 'inside' for your internal network and 'outside' for the public network if you have that connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:42:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-04-02T13:42:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Communication Between ASA Multiple Contexts</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235740#M861317</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to create the following design:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1)	 Multiple Contexts:  Customer Internal Network; Business Partner A, Business Partner B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2)	Customer net can talk to Business Partner A and B (from the inside)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3)	Business Partners can't talk to each other.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this is possible, am I gaining any additional security with using this type of context design vs. putting the business partner connectivity in DMZ interfaces and using ACLs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:13:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235740#M861317</guid>
      <dc:creator>captain131</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T15:13:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Communication Between ASA Multiple Contexts</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235741#M861318</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a specific reason why you would not have a single context and use a different interface for Internal, BP-A, and BP-B? It's possible to do it with multiple contexts, but I think it would be easier to do it with a single context.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:27:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235741#M861318</guid>
      <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-01T20:27:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Communication Between ASA Multiple Contexts</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235742#M861319</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No specific reason.  My reasoning (which may be convoluted are completely off) was to give each business partner the security of being seperated by a virtual firewall from one another.  It's not a strict requirement, but more of a design "thought" I had when reviewing the functionality of contexts.  It sounds like I'm making it more complicated than it needs to be?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235742#M861319</guid>
      <dc:creator>captain131</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-02T11:51:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Communication Between ASA Multiple Contexts</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235743#M861320</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can understand your thinking, but IMO using a single context can be just as secure. I only use multiple contexts when necessary. Also keep in mind that you can not use VPN with multiple contexts. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:11:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235743#M861320</guid>
      <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-02T13:11:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Communication Between ASA Multiple Contexts</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235744#M861321</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Colin - Thanks for the feedback.  I've had similar feedback from other engineers I spoke with offline.  I will very likely go back to the single context mode.  Would you suggest using DMZ's as part of the design?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:35:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235744#M861321</guid>
      <dc:creator>captain131</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-02T13:35:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Communication Between ASA Multiple Contexts</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235745#M861324</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Absolutely. I would create a new DMZ for each customer. Use 'inside' for your internal network and 'outside' for the public network if you have that connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:42:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/communication-between-asa-multiple-contexts/m-p/1235745#M861324</guid>
      <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-02T13:42:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

