<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IDSM-2 load sharing across two chassis in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-2-load-sharing-across-two-chassis/m-p/681126#M87221</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess it depends on your topology.  If your 6509 switches are used as layer 3 switches using HSRP then even if only one 6509 is used as HSRP active for all VLANs and you have two IDSMs in there, you will miss all the traffic that is going through your HSRP standby chassis.  For example, outbound traffic of a VLAN may be seen by HSRP Primary's IDSMs, but return traffic could be comming in both directions (HSRP Primary and Secondary 6509s).  If you have one IDSM on each 6509s, then you are already using both of them.  Please note that IDSM2's throughput is 600 Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edward&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>edwakim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-03-20T03:01:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IDSM-2 load sharing across two chassis</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-2-load-sharing-across-two-chassis/m-p/681125#M87218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are currently putting together a solution that I have come in halfway through just after some assistance in regards to setting up the IDS. We have 2 * 6509 chassis, 2 * IDSM-2 modules. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scenario 1 - Both IDSM-2 Modules in primary chassis, can load balance traffic to IDS. Primary Chassis failure = no ids. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scenario 2 - IDSM-2 Module in each chassis, active/standby scenario. Can basically only use one IDSM modules throughput. Chassis failure still have IDS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment I am leaning towards the first scenario and no IDS if we have a chassis failure. Just wondering if it's possible to load balance in scenario 2. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 10:31:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-2-load-sharing-across-two-chassis/m-p/681125#M87218</guid>
      <dc:creator>alastairholloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T10:31:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IDSM-2 load sharing across two chassis</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-2-load-sharing-across-two-chassis/m-p/681126#M87221</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess it depends on your topology.  If your 6509 switches are used as layer 3 switches using HSRP then even if only one 6509 is used as HSRP active for all VLANs and you have two IDSMs in there, you will miss all the traffic that is going through your HSRP standby chassis.  For example, outbound traffic of a VLAN may be seen by HSRP Primary's IDSMs, but return traffic could be comming in both directions (HSRP Primary and Secondary 6509s).  If you have one IDSM on each 6509s, then you are already using both of them.  Please note that IDSM2's throughput is 600 Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edward&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-2-load-sharing-across-two-chassis/m-p/681126#M87221</guid>
      <dc:creator>edwakim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-20T03:01:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

