<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA active active in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active/m-p/1210826#M875075</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I was thinking to use ASA5520 in Active Active mode but I have a doubt about how it work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As from my readings the context that is in a falover group can process traffic only in the unit where this context is active. Therefore for this context there is no load-balancing. To acieve load balancing you have to create 2nd context and set it as active on the secondary unit. is that correct ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>helenio</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T15:04:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA active active</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active/m-p/1210826#M875075</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I was thinking to use ASA5520 in Active Active mode but I have a doubt about how it work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As from my readings the context that is in a falover group can process traffic only in the unit where this context is active. Therefore for this context there is no load-balancing. To acieve load balancing you have to create 2nd context and set it as active on the secondary unit. is that correct ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active/m-p/1210826#M875075</guid>
      <dc:creator>helenio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T15:04:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA active active</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active/m-p/1210827#M875076</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your statement is correct.  There is no load balanciong for a single context.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Active active is a manual configuration making half your contexts active on one ASA and the half active on ther other ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:44:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active/m-p/1210827#M875076</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamesLuther</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-13T22:44:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

