<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: avoid NAT in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/avoid-nat/m-p/1167335#M875964</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The no-nat control globally inforces NAT or disables it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To answer your question - no.  If you assume that everything going thru the firewall will be nattted. Then the only thing you need to do is write exception rules?.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:12:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>andrew.prince</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-23T10:12:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>avoid NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/avoid-nat/m-p/1167334#M875963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are using PIX 525 (version 7.2(3))&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when i configure an rdp access (for example) from inside to a computer in DMZ, i configure the access rule (in security policy) then i MUST configure a NAT rule that keeps my IP unchanged between inside and DMZ:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,DMZ-WEB) IT_VLAN IT_VLAN netmask 255.255.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is it possible to bypass this NAT rule?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other words: is it possible to say to PIX: if you find a NAT rule, then use it. And if you don't find a NAT rule then just route the packet and don't ask for a NAT rule like above?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i found a command called no nat-control. i am not sure this the solution. i tried it but it did not work!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:54:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/avoid-nat/m-p/1167334#M875963</guid>
      <dc:creator>ohassairi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:54:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: avoid NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/avoid-nat/m-p/1167335#M875964</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The no-nat control globally inforces NAT or disables it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To answer your question - no.  If you assume that everything going thru the firewall will be nattted. Then the only thing you need to do is write exception rules?.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:12:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/avoid-nat/m-p/1167335#M875964</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrew.prince</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-23T10:12:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

