<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FWSM Multiple Context in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-multiple-context/m-p/1150864#M876071</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gerard,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you elaborate a bit on what exactly you are trying to accomplish? For starters, are you talking about traffic passing *through* these contexts or management traffic *to* these contexts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:44:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>robertson.michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-19T21:44:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FWSM Multiple Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-multiple-context/m-p/1150863#M876065</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have transparent multiple context setup on FWSM. all are fine. What I'm trying to do is, I want context A be able to talk to context B and vice versa but not to context C. Any idea?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ContextA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ContextB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ContextC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-multiple-context/m-p/1150863#M876065</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gerard Gacusan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:53:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM Multiple Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-multiple-context/m-p/1150864#M876071</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gerard,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you elaborate a bit on what exactly you are trying to accomplish? For starters, are you talking about traffic passing *through* these contexts or management traffic *to* these contexts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:44:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-multiple-context/m-p/1150864#M876071</guid>
      <dc:creator>robertson.michael</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-19T21:44:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM Multiple Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-multiple-context/m-p/1150865#M876076</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to allow traffic from one context to another. Say, vlan 100 (in ContextA) and vlan101 (in ContextB) Does it mean, it needs to leave via its lower security-level 0 to route between contexts and add outside-acl to allow traffic? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or is it possible to communicate within inside network?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm using transparent mode in all contexts btw.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gerard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:42:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-multiple-context/m-p/1150865#M876076</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gerard Gacusan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-19T22:42:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM Multiple Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-multiple-context/m-p/1150866#M876078</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is relevant so-called shared resources. Although, i need in Transparent mode. Should be same approach? Not sure if there are limitations ...Any idea?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/fwsm/fwsm40/configuration/guide/exampl_f.html#wp1032182" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/fwsm/fwsm40/configuration/guide/exampl_f.html#wp1032182&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:38:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-multiple-context/m-p/1150866#M876078</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gerard Gacusan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-20T04:38:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

