<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic server gateway address in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/server-gateway-address/m-p/1176345#M876644</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;FWSM in multi context mode and routed mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm coming from checkpoint world and there we have VRRP gateways we handout to clients/servers. Going through a config guide for FWSM I see the following.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My quiestion is which address will be handed out to the clients/servers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface vlan 201&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;security-level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address 10.0.3.1 255.255.255.0 standby 10.0.3.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:48:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>770801tvdhaar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:48:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>server gateway address</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/server-gateway-address/m-p/1176345#M876644</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;FWSM in multi context mode and routed mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm coming from checkpoint world and there we have VRRP gateways we handout to clients/servers. Going through a config guide for FWSM I see the following.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My quiestion is which address will be handed out to the clients/servers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface vlan 201&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;security-level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address 10.0.3.1 255.255.255.0 standby 10.0.3.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:48:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/server-gateway-address/m-p/1176345#M876644</guid>
      <dc:creator>770801tvdhaar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:48:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: server gateway address</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/server-gateway-address/m-p/1176346#M876648</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be the address assigned to the primary firewall - in your example from above 10.0.3.1. If the primary firewall fails over to the standby the address moves to the standby as well. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:27:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/server-gateway-address/m-p/1176346#M876648</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-10T15:27:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: server gateway address</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/server-gateway-address/m-p/1176347#M876651</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanx!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:29:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/server-gateway-address/m-p/1176347#M876651</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tyrone Van Der Haar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-10T18:29:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: server gateway address</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/server-gateway-address/m-p/1176348#M876654</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;one last question, I suppose if I'm setting up a static route I point it to the active firewall and if that goes down the adddress is moved to the standby?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just have to make sure:-)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:16:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/server-gateway-address/m-p/1176348#M876654</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tyrone Van Der Haar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-11T08:16:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: server gateway address</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/server-gateway-address/m-p/1176349#M876656</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just have to make sure:-) - nothing wrong with that &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, you would use the primary firewall IP address as the next-hop in your static route.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:24:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/server-gateway-address/m-p/1176349#M876656</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-11T10:24:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

