<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Possible with ASA appliance in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226252#M876991</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone know if this is possible with ASA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;appliance?  Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cisco24x7</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-10T01:14:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Possible with ASA appliance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226244#M876980</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Looking at the diagram, is it possible to &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ssh from the WinXP machine to both Eth0 (&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IP address 192.168.2.2) and Eth1 (IP &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;address 192.168.3.2)?  If it is possible,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how do I go about doing it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:44:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226244#M876980</guid>
      <dc:creator>cisco24x7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:44:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible with ASA appliance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226245#M876981</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;David,  my opinion ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can ssh to E0 provided you have allow ssh to WinXP. One cannot ssh to  E1 from WinXP unless you have an Ipsec tunnel , and  management-access statement in ASA firewall. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;{edit}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually... let me re-look at the diagram again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read to quick, you shoudl be able to SSH to both hosts 192.168.2.2 and 192.168.3.2  through alc permittng ssh through outside interface. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:13:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226245#M876981</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T02:13:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible with ASA appliance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226246#M876982</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;WinXP can ssh to 192.168.2.2 without any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;issues.  That's easy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When WinXP ssh to host 192.168.3.2, this &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is where you run into asymetric route. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other words, traffics will Enter E0, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;leave E2 and comeback into E1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How does ASA handle it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:32:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226246#M876982</guid>
      <dc:creator>cisco24x7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T02:32:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible with ASA appliance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226247#M876984</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is centOS 192.168.3.2 gateway 192.168.3.1? and what message is showing in asdm log for the traffic back.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:44:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226247#M876984</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T02:44:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible with ASA appliance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226248#M876986</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;CentOS gateway has two NICs:  192.168.2.2 (eth1) and 192.168.3.2 (eth2).  CentOS' default gateway is 192.168.2.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:47:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226248#M876986</guid>
      <dc:creator>cisco24x7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T02:47:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible with ASA appliance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226249#M876988</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If Im understanding this right, I see the asymetric routing but I believe the centOS 192.168.3.2 does not know to get backout on E2 as it supose to but using centOS only default gateway 192.168.2.1, if centOS NIC2 192.168.3.2 had a default gateway of 3.1 it should get backout on E2.. unless Im missing something.   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:54:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226249#M876988</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T02:54:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible with ASA appliance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226250#M876989</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the flow sequence:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WinXP makes an SSH connection to 192.168.3.2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Traffics will hit ASA E0, go out of E2 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface.  It will then hit Eth2 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface of CentOS. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the return path, traffics will leave&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eth1 of CentOS because the default gateway for CentOS is 192.168.2.1.  Now,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you got asymetric route.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226250#M876989</guid>
      <dc:creator>cisco24x7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T03:01:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible with ASA appliance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226251#M876990</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a good one and to be honest I would have to lab this out, anyone can provide some thoughts , E1 should not be taking that traffic E2 back out E0 , I wander if ip verify reverse-path  would prevent this. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:17:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226251#M876990</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T03:17:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible with ASA appliance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226252#M876991</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone know if this is possible with ASA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;appliance?  Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-asa-appliance/m-p/1226252#M876991</guid>
      <dc:creator>cisco24x7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-10T01:14:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

