<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Throughput of IDSM-2 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649566#M87760</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the real-world note: We have numerous Cisco IDS devices, from 4215s up through 4250XLs and IDSM-2s.  None of them meet their rated numbers, most start dropping packets at 1/3 of their claimed capacity.  This is even after several TAC cases and extensive investigation by TAC engineers and internal developers.  Maybe if you shut of 90% of signatures you could get there.  Don't believe the hype.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:07:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>attmidsteam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-02-16T19:07:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Throughput of IDSM-2</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649561#M87755</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Cisco Doc says the IDSM-2's throughput is 600Mbps in promiscuous mode, so what throughput I would get if I just send traffic to one data port.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 10:25:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649561#M87755</guid>
      <dc:creator>a12288</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T10:25:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput of IDSM-2</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649562#M87756</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;600Mbps limit is for the sensor.  Even though it has two data ports (10/100/1000 port each), combined traffic sent to the interface(s) should not exceed 600Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edward&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:11:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649562#M87756</guid>
      <dc:creator>edwakim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-18T16:11:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput of IDSM-2</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649563#M87757</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your prompt replay, does it mean I could and would have 600Mbps throughput if I am going to use one data port only? thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:16:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649563#M87757</guid>
      <dc:creator>a12288</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-18T16:16:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput of IDSM-2</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649564#M87758</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Each interface can take up to 1000 Mbps, but sensor can only handle 600 Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason that we have two dataports is for the inline mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edward&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:39:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649564#M87758</guid>
      <dc:creator>edwakim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-18T16:39:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput of IDSM-2</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649565#M87759</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:47:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649565#M87759</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2007-02-16T00:47:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput of IDSM-2</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649566#M87760</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the real-world note: We have numerous Cisco IDS devices, from 4215s up through 4250XLs and IDSM-2s.  None of them meet their rated numbers, most start dropping packets at 1/3 of their claimed capacity.  This is even after several TAC cases and extensive investigation by TAC engineers and internal developers.  Maybe if you shut of 90% of signatures you could get there.  Don't believe the hype.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:07:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649566#M87760</guid>
      <dc:creator>attmidsteam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-16T19:07:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput of IDSM-2</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649567#M87761</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will still be 600Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you CAN still overload the sensor by sending traffic to one interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edward&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:00:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649567#M87761</guid>
      <dc:creator>edwakim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-16T23:00:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput of IDSM-2</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649568#M87762</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks, this is what I need to know (behind the hype) before we would issue a PO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:26:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649568#M87762</guid>
      <dc:creator>a12288</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-19T13:26:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput of IDSM-2</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649569#M87763</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its 600Mbps if you're in Passive mode, and only 500Mbps if its Inline.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649569#M87763</guid>
      <dc:creator>clausonna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-19T18:27:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput of IDSM-2</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649570#M87766</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;More information can be found here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2706/products_data_sheet09186a00801e55dd.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2706/products_data_sheet09186a00801e55dd.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edward&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/throughput-of-idsm-2/m-p/649570#M87766</guid>
      <dc:creator>edwakim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-19T18:59:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

