<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Possible false postive 12900 Unrecognized FTP Command in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-false-postive-12900-unrecognized-ftp-command/m-p/651153#M88161</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Signature tripping on the following contents. Is this an invalid ftp command? or does the signature need tunning?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0x0000  0000 0014 005e 0029 0047 0045 0000 0018 0019 000a 0070 0000 0008 0000 0045 0000  ....^)GE........p......E.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0x0010  0000 003a fff7 0069 0040 0000 0034 0006 005f ffc7 0047 0010 001b 0033 000a ffc8  ..:..i@..4.._..G....3.... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0x0020  ff82 ff82 000a ff82 0000 0015 002e 001d ff9d ffc4 0065 ff94 0005 ffd9 0050 0018  ...................e......P.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0x0030  0061 0008 ffd6 ffd0 0000 0000 0041 0055 0054 0048 0020 004b 0045 0052 0042 0045  a..........AUTH KERBE &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0x0040  0052 004f 0053 005f 0056 0035 000d 000a  ROS_V5.... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 10:21:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>john.stark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T10:21:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Possible false postive 12900 Unrecognized FTP Command</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-false-postive-12900-unrecognized-ftp-command/m-p/651153#M88161</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Signature tripping on the following contents. Is this an invalid ftp command? or does the signature need tunning?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0x0000  0000 0014 005e 0029 0047 0045 0000 0018 0019 000a 0070 0000 0008 0000 0045 0000  ....^)GE........p......E.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0x0010  0000 003a fff7 0069 0040 0000 0034 0006 005f ffc7 0047 0010 001b 0033 000a ffc8  ..:..i@..4.._..G....3.... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0x0020  ff82 ff82 000a ff82 0000 0015 002e 001d ff9d ffc4 0065 ff94 0005 ffd9 0050 0018  ...................e......P.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0x0030  0061 0008 ffd6 ffd0 0000 0000 0041 0055 0054 0048 0020 004b 0045 0052 0042 0045  a..........AUTH KERBE &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0x0040  0052 004f 0053 005f 0056 0035 000d 000a  ROS_V5.... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 10:21:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-false-postive-12900-unrecognized-ftp-command/m-p/651153#M88161</guid>
      <dc:creator>john.stark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T10:21:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible false postive 12900 Unrecognized FTP Command</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-false-postive-12900-unrecognized-ftp-command/m-p/651154#M88162</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFAICT, "AUTH Kerberos_V5" is valid. see:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2228.txt" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2228.txt&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 22:22:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-false-postive-12900-unrecognized-ftp-command/m-p/651154#M88162</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhellman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-04T22:22:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible false postive 12900 Unrecognized FTP Command</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-false-postive-12900-unrecognized-ftp-command/m-p/651155#M88163</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So 129xx sigs... The "recognized" commands are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;user, pass, acct, cwd, cdup, smnt, quit, rein, port, pasv, type, stru, mode, retr, stor, stou, appe, allo, rest, rnfr, rnto, abor, dele, rmd, mkd, pwd, list, nlst, site, syst, stat, help, noop&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which parallel rfc-959. Anything not one of those, should fire 12900, the unrecignized ftp command sig.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RFC 2228 are security extensions to the FTP specifications RFC 959. So while they're legal   for some FTP servers, the commands aren't required.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We can argue it either way, and rather than go down that rabbithole, I've provided the list of recognized commands.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-false-postive-12900-unrecognized-ftp-command/m-p/651155#M88163</guid>
      <dc:creator>wsulym</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-05T17:07:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible false postive 12900 Unrecognized FTP Command</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-false-postive-12900-unrecognized-ftp-command/m-p/651156#M88164</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would you recommend for my environment auth is a normal command?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks like I am also seeing trigger packets for auth tls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; triggerPacket: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;000000  00 18 19 0A 70 00 00 14  F2 92 F8 1A 08 00 45 00  ....p.........E.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;000010  00 32 DA B6 40 00 71 06  69 4E C0 8B 4F 01 43 80  .2..@.q.iN..O.C.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;000020  72 B4 C7 E2 00 15 ED 0C  D2 E2 79 29 C7 D1 50 18  r.........y)..P.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;000030  FF DB 11 F4 00 00 41 55  54 48 20 54 4C 53 0D 0A  ......AUTH TLS..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:45:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-false-postive-12900-unrecognized-ftp-command/m-p/651156#M88164</guid>
      <dc:creator>john.stark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-05T17:45:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

