<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Static NAT Problem in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131931#M893086</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe a packet cpature between the two (or on the pix/asa) will shed some light. From the firewall you can ping the VIP correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:01:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T19:01:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131926#M893072</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to map a Public IP to private Virtual IP on the load balancer which forwards the traffic to web servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have done all the necessary configurations on ASA, but the web service is still not accessible from the internet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configuration: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Outside IP: 95.12.60.31&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inside IP (VIP): 10.1.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 95.12.60.31,10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list outside_in extended permit ip any any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group outside_in in interface OUTSIDE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The web service is accessible locally on 10.1.1.1 IP. While I am accessing via the public IP over the internet I can see following on 'sh conn' display&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TCP out 66.72.101.23:2984 in 10.1.1.1:80 idle 0:00:02 bytes 0 flags AX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What could be wrong. Please assist. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:17:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131926#M893072</guid>
      <dc:creator>new_networker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:17:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131927#M893074</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does your load balancer have a default route going out?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:23:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131927#M893074</guid>
      <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-24T18:23:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131928#M893076</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. The default route is present. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I didn't mention earlier that the ping to public IP over the internet is successful. I have also configured the load balancer for ping requests. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any other clues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:34:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131928#M893076</guid>
      <dc:creator>new_networker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-24T18:34:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131929#M893080</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the NAT translation dies, what is the byte count? I assume you have hit counts on your ACL?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:39:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131929#M893080</guid>
      <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-24T18:39:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131930#M893083</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. There are hit counts on the access-list for every hit via the browser. Something like &lt;HITCNT&gt; 0xd1647829.&lt;/HITCNT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:59:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131930#M893083</guid>
      <dc:creator>new_networker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-24T18:59:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131931#M893086</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe a packet cpature between the two (or on the pix/asa) will shed some light. From the firewall you can ping the VIP correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:01:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131931#M893086</guid>
      <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-24T19:01:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131932#M893088</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. I am able to ping the VIP from firewall. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try the capture tommorow. In the meanwhile any other suggestions will be great. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:15:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-problem/m-p/1131932#M893088</guid>
      <dc:creator>new_networker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-24T19:15:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

