<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: zero downtime upgrade question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zero-downtime-upgrade-question/m-p/1064680#M893618</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;pix'es running 7.x or 8.x also support zero downtime upgrade using failover pairs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;depending on your failover configuration, there might be some disruption.  active http sessions might for example have to restart/refresh.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for the most part it works as advertised.  if there is more than one bootable image in flash, you should specify which one to use. as well as asdm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:35:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>srue</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-17T19:35:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>zero downtime upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zero-downtime-upgrade-question/m-p/1064678#M893616</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can this only be performed on ASA appliances, or can it be done on a pair of PIX 515-E's, that currently run 7.x code, and we just want to bump it up another revision? And has anyone done a zero downtime upgrade and is it truly non-disruptive?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:12:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zero-downtime-upgrade-question/m-p/1064678#M893616</guid>
      <dc:creator>mjsully</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:12:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: zero downtime upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zero-downtime-upgrade-question/m-p/1064679#M893617</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;someone must have some experience with this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would also like confimation that when I upgrade a PIX failover set from 7.1 to 7.2, do I need to specify the boot file like I do on an ASA, or will they just boot to the new image I copy, provide I delete the current one?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:12:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zero-downtime-upgrade-question/m-p/1064679#M893617</guid>
      <dc:creator>mjsully</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-17T19:12:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: zero downtime upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zero-downtime-upgrade-question/m-p/1064680#M893618</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;pix'es running 7.x or 8.x also support zero downtime upgrade using failover pairs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;depending on your failover configuration, there might be some disruption.  active http sessions might for example have to restart/refresh.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for the most part it works as advertised.  if there is more than one bootable image in flash, you should specify which one to use. as well as asdm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:35:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zero-downtime-upgrade-question/m-p/1064680#M893618</guid>
      <dc:creator>srue</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-17T19:35:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

