<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Routing on same security interface in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/routing-on-same-security-interface/m-p/1099835#M894094</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using 7.0 on PIX 535A and have 4 different subnets on 4 physical interfaces 10.5.2.144/28, 10.5.2.160/28, 10.5.2.176/28 and 10.5.2.129/30. These interfaces are at same security level 100, I have enabled "same-security-traffic permit inter-interface" Still the devices in these subnets cannot communicate with other. Firewall is in routed mode. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-JK &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:07:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jkarkhanis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:07:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Routing on same security interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/routing-on-same-security-interface/m-p/1099835#M894094</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using 7.0 on PIX 535A and have 4 different subnets on 4 physical interfaces 10.5.2.144/28, 10.5.2.160/28, 10.5.2.176/28 and 10.5.2.129/30. These interfaces are at same security level 100, I have enabled "same-security-traffic permit inter-interface" Still the devices in these subnets cannot communicate with other. Firewall is in routed mode. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-JK &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:07:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/routing-on-same-security-interface/m-p/1099835#M894094</guid>
      <dc:creator>jkarkhanis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:07:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Routing on same security interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/routing-on-same-security-interface/m-p/1099836#M894095</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Jayesh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Try this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   no nat-control&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:46:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/routing-on-same-security-interface/m-p/1099836#M894095</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alan Huseyin Kayahan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-04T07:46:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Routing on same security interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/routing-on-same-security-interface/m-p/1099837#M894097</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or, if you need NAT (because no nat-control turns off NAT globally), try defining either a NAT 0 or a nat 'NET STATIC' that NATs the address range from interface to interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There MUST be some NAT relationshoip between any two interfaces that wish to communicate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:10:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/routing-on-same-security-interface/m-p/1099837#M894097</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmayes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-04T21:10:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Routing on same security interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/routing-on-same-security-interface/m-p/1099838#M894100</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;no nat-control does not turn off NAT globally. Your nat statements will go on working. It only removes the "any traffic flow must match a NAT statement" must.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:04:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/routing-on-same-security-interface/m-p/1099838#M894100</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alan Huseyin Kayahan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-05T00:04:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

